conarb
REGISTERED
Here is a little on Proposition 218:\ said:California’s tiered water pricing has to be based on delivery costs rather than conservation incentives, a state appeals court ruled. The verdict will have major implications on California’s efforts to conserve water amidst its unprecedented drought.The city’s water pricing system charged customers who used small quantities of water, a lower rate than customers who used larger quantities.¹
The same could be applied to smart meters charging more to TOD usage and water/sewer districts charging more in wealthy areas than in poor areas. Since building departments have been successfully sued for charging more for permits than the cost of delivery of services maybe this can be used to stop building departments from adding affordable housing to their services forcing builders to pay for affordable housing when permitting market rate housing.\ said:Summary° The official ballot summary that appeared on the ballot said:
° Limits authority of local governments to impose taxes and property-related assessments, fees, and charges. Requires majority of voters approve increases in general taxes and reiterates that two-thirds must approve special tax.
° Assessments, fees, and charges must be submitted to property owners for approval or rejection, after notice and public hearing.
° Assessments are limited to the special benefit conferred.
° Fees and charges are limited to the cost of providing the service and may not be imposed for general governmental services available to the public.²
¹ http://rt.com/usa/251453-capistrano-water-verdict-california/
² http://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_218,_Voter_Approval_Required_Before_Local_Tax_Increases_%281996%29