Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
I agree. Which method do you see used?Those are two ways to ground the secondary side of a transformer as a Separately Derived System (SDS).
When the primary side system is grounded, another option for grounding the secondary side as a non-SDS is by connecting the primary side grounded conductor to one of the secondary conductors. Then no Grounding Electrode Conductor is required, there is no System Bonding Jumper, and the Supply Side Bonding Jumper is just called an EGC.
Just FYI.
Cheers, Wayne
That is because Option 1 is the far superior method in most instances.I use option 1.
The only difference is the location of the SBJ and where the GEC terminates. Why is it better to have those at the transformer?That is because Option 1 is the far superior method in most instances.
Two reason:The only difference is the location of the SBJ and where the GEC terminates. Why is it better to have those at the transformer?
Cheers, Wayne