1. ATTENTION returning members. If you are coming here from the old forum for the first time, you will need to reset you password. However, we had an email problem getting password reset links set out to a lot of the email addresses. That problem is temporarily rectified but IF you still have an issue, email me direct at info@thebuildingcodeforum.com and I will give you a temporary password.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by clicking here: Upgrades
    Dismiss Notice

Urinal required in a single occupancy toilet for "B" occupancy?

Discussion in 'Plumbing Codes' started by JPohling, Oct 2, 2018.

  1. JPohling

    JPohling Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    825
    Likes Received:
    52
    We have a plan checker that is insisting that because the California Plumbing Code table 422.1 indicates that a urinal is required for 1-100 men for a B occupancy that even when a single room occupancy toilet room is allowed to serve both employees and customers that this room also is required to have a urinal.

    I cannot find any language or exception to this.

    What do you good people think?
     
  2. mark handler

    mark handler Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    9,766
    Likes Received:
    579
    The closest thing to a waver is Footnote # 3, but it is for A and E occupancies. OL< 50
     
  3. mtlogcabin

    mtlogcabin Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2009
    Messages:
    6,856
    Likes Received:
    598
    I believe he is correct when reviewing the entire table there are occupancies that do not require urinals and occupancies that have different ratios.
    Look at footnote 4 where it clarifies urinals are not a substitute for water closets they are in addition to

    The IPC puts WC and urinals in the same column and then refers you to this section
    419.2 Substitution for water closets.
    In each bathroom or toilet room, urinals shall not be substituted for more than 67 percent of the required water closets in assembly and educational occupancies. Urinals shall not be substituted for more than 50 percent of the required water closets in all other occupancies.
     
    Pcinspector1 likes this.
  4. ADAguy

    ADAguy Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2013
    Messages:
    2,614
    Likes Received:
    225
    Are troughs still legal?
     
  5. JPohling

    JPohling Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    825
    Likes Received:
    52
    I guess I see no real advantage to having a urinal in a single occupancy toilet room in terms of fixture count. Only using one at a time.
    Never had this "requirement" enforced before.
     
  6. north star

    north star Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,595
    Likes Received:
    207
    * = * = *
    I do not believe that they are, because of privacy issues, plus
    there aren't any ADA compliant troughs.......Available, Yes !
    Legal, No !


    * = * = *
     
  7. JPohling

    JPohling Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    825
    Likes Received:
    52
    How is it that we need to label the single occupancy room gender neutral then
    place a gender specific fixture within the room?

    Seems like everyone is in agreement that a urinal is a requirement for a single
    occupancy toilet room in a B occupancy? It specifically states "one toilet facility".
    It does not say "one toilet and a urinal facility".
     
  8. north star

    north star Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,595
    Likes Received:
    207
    & = &

    JPohling,

    IMO, ...the Codes are not [ yet ] synonymous with the current cultural
    environment.......In the real world, there is no Gender Neutral
    designation !.......Either you is, or you ain't.


    & = &
     
  9. ADAguy

    ADAguy Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2013
    Messages:
    2,614
    Likes Received:
    225
    But "if" you are, then what?
     
  10. north star

    north star Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,595
    Likes Received:
    207
    # ~ #

    Are what ?.........Are a "man", or are a "woman" ?

    # ~ #
     
  11. ADAguy

    ADAguy Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2013
    Messages:
    2,614
    Likes Received:
    225
    some are "both" with "dual" fixtures (smiling)
     
  12. JPohling

    JPohling Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    825
    Likes Received:
    52
    The real question is who believes that the definition of a "single toilet facility" contains a urinal. Other than Palo Alto that is................
     
  13. north star

    north star Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,595
    Likes Received:
    207
    ! = ! = !

    ADAguy,

    I am going to have to pull the "I don't know about this stuff" card on you.

    If some are both with dual fixtures, (1) Are both sets of [ plbg. ] fixtures

    fully operational & capable of fulfilling their intended, ORIGINAL birthed
    design, or (2) Are some of the dual fixtures for marketing \ confusion

    purposes, or other ? :confused:

    ! = ! = !
     
  14. mark handler

    mark handler Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    9,766
    Likes Received:
    579
    The term "single toilet facility" is not defined in the codes, But IMPO a "single toilet facility", that is designed for use by no more than one person at a time, can contain a toilet and urinal. it is just used by one person at a time.
     
  15. mtlogcabin

    mtlogcabin Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2009
    Messages:
    6,856
    Likes Received:
    598
    Our state amended that table and only requires the urinal in single user toilet facilities where food and drink are served.
     
  16. Yikes

    Yikes Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    1,265
    Likes Received:
    117
    California identifies a single-user facility as a "toilet facility with no more than one water closet and one urinal with a locking mechanism controlled by the user".
    https://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dsa/bulletins/BU_17-01-01.pdf
    Therefore, it is not useful to argue that the presence of both toilet and urinal negates the purpose of a gender neutral single user facility.
     
  17. ADAguy

    ADAguy Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2013
    Messages:
    2,614
    Likes Received:
    225
    Convenience vs plumbing? Kilt vs zipper? Depends on you individual plumbing.
     
  18. Pcinspector1

    Pcinspector1 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Messages:
    2,524
    Likes Received:
    244
    So if you were wanting to remove this requirement, what would change and how could you word it?

    Whats the reasoning for this? This is goofy.

    A toilet takes care of most users I would think?
     
  19. mtlogcabin

    mtlogcabin Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2009
    Messages:
    6,856
    Likes Received:
    598
    Sanitation would be my first guess Saving water would be my 2nd guess
     
    Pcinspector1 likes this.
  20. ADAguy

    ADAguy Sawhorse

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2013
    Messages:
    2,614
    Likes Received:
    225
    HMMMM? both make sense but a urinal could be waterless vs a toilet.
     

Share This Page