NFRMarshal
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2010
- Messages
- 42
How do you handling this. We apply 313.1 unless the building was constructed for the purpose of automobile storage such as a parking garage or automotive repair shop.
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
With some vehicles, VWs from about 10 years back come to mind, disconnecting the battery for extended time period will result in loss of programming.bptp32 said:FC of NYS; Our concern is the disconnect of the batteries. Some of the auto display showrooms state that they cannot disconnect the batteries because thay are then not able to access the vehicle. Some of the batteries are located in a sealed enclosure in the trunk areas. The new foreign vehciles are set up differnetly than having the battery in the engine compartment. thanks for the responses
In my opinion, if 314 applies, which it sounds like it does, then they have a choice of copying with the code, not displaying the vehicle indoors OR they can apply for a variance in their situation to whomever handles variances in your jurisdiction. In my case the variance application goes to the State, they aren't handled on a local level.bptp32 said:FC of NYS; Our concern is the disconnect of the batteries. Some of the auto display showrooms state that they cannot disconnect the batteries because thay are then not able to access the vehicle. Some of the batteries are located in a sealed enclosure in the trunk areas. The new foreign vehciles are set up differnetly than having the battery in the engine compartment. thanks for the responses
excellent. Now let me throw you a curve ball. PA did not adopt Chapter 1 of the IBC. Does it appear as though doing that created a safety issue?Builder Bob said:IBC 101.4 which leads to 101.4.6
while I have not looked at it in this context, in PA, we wrote our own chapter 1, I would check and see if this circumstance is covered there,.............jar546 said:excellent. Now let me throw you a curve ball. PA did not adopt Chapter 1 of the IBC. Does it appear as though doing that created a safety issue?
It would depend upon how the fire safety/prevention portion of the code was adopted and allowed to be implemented. ALSO SC did not adopt chapter 1 of the fire codes ----- it does create a few issues when slogging through the legislative and legal management aspect of fire code enforcement.jar546 said:excellent. Now let me throw you a curve ball. PA did not adopt Chapter 1 of the IBC. Does it appear as though doing that created a safety issue?