• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Vent Under Cabinet Missing Duct, Part 2

Tom T

REGISTERED
Joined
Dec 4, 2023
Messages
18
Location
Manitoba Canada
I bought a new house last year and I had a home inspection completed at the close to one year mark. The inspector noticed under the two bathroom vanities and the kitchen sink that are 'missing heating boots'. The heat in those cavities is something else when we turn up the heat to start the day. They are melting the dishwasher pods through the container. If this doesn't meet code, I don't know how they are going to pop those open to fix things properly. Here are some pics, starting with the main bathroom:
 

Attachments

  • 20231204_073053.jpg
    20231204_073053.jpg
    2.2 MB · Views: 9
  • 20231204_075007.jpg
    20231204_075007.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 9
  • 20231204_075055.jpg
    20231204_075055.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 9
  • 20231204_075104.jpg
    20231204_075104.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 8
And the kitchen; illustrating the heat melting the pods:
 

Attachments

  • 20231204_082725.jpg
    20231204_082725.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 3
  • 20231204_082748.jpg
    20231204_082748.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 3
I'm from Canada, so I am hoping there is someone out there that knows whether or not this went against a building/ heating code here.
 
We do have some good Canadiens here and even a Canadien section....They would see it better there, but one of them will see this soon I imagine...
 
When you see no evidence of glue, does it make you wonder if there is any?

20231204_075055.jpg
 
Well I don't want to alarm you but I would expect to see some excess between the fittings. Just because there is none does not necessarily mean that there is none ... when I impersonated a lawyer I would say, "The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".
 
Well I don't want to alarm you but I would expect to see some excess between the fittings. Just because there is none does not necessarily mean that there is none ... when I impersonated a lawyer I would say, "The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".

Any advice on how I would confirm that?

Wouldn't that mean that there is a good chance it's like that behind the wall?
 
Back
Top