BSSTG
Gold Member
Greetings all,
I have an existing RV park (big one) adding some spots. It was built before I got here. The engineer want to use C900 for water pipe and it's not listed in the tables 605.3 or 605.4 for water service OR distribution per the 2012 IPC. I suspect it't because it's a gasketed pipe as there are none approved. Anyway, the engineer sent me the following in an email.
Byron, I’m trying to educate myself on why the IPC would not allow C900 pipe to be used in underground water distribution systems. It’s making little sense to me. I’ve been doing some online reading on some engineering tip sites and the consensus is that in the larger pipes 4” and above, glued joints have a greater tendency to leak – maybe its common that the workers don’t get enough glue (?). But when they do get adequate glue then it’s creating a rigid pipe that has more tendency to break in our moving soil around here.
I would consider a C900 installation using restrained mechanical joints to be a superior installation to glued joint 4” Sch 40. I’ve looked online for any guidance as to why gasketed pipe is not allowed in buried water distribution line but have not had any luck. I fully understand in a building. If you have some information to help me understand this I’d appreciate it.
I’ve told XXXX that with the glued joints to make darned sure they get it glued well and compact the sand with at least 6” all around or he’s going to have problems.
Now I know these folks and for sure the engineer is trying to cover for her goof. I'm going to try to contact a friend on the Tx Plumbing Board to get his opinion too.
Additionally, I can see where I might be able to approve the C900 utlitizing section 105.2 of the Code, (alternative materials). But this is not my area of expertise. I will say I'm learry of the argument the engineer is giving me. I too have an RV park and used all Sch 40 PVC for all my lines so I could throw them in the same ditch. Never had a problem in 12 years.
Opinions?
Byron
I have an existing RV park (big one) adding some spots. It was built before I got here. The engineer want to use C900 for water pipe and it's not listed in the tables 605.3 or 605.4 for water service OR distribution per the 2012 IPC. I suspect it't because it's a gasketed pipe as there are none approved. Anyway, the engineer sent me the following in an email.
Byron, I’m trying to educate myself on why the IPC would not allow C900 pipe to be used in underground water distribution systems. It’s making little sense to me. I’ve been doing some online reading on some engineering tip sites and the consensus is that in the larger pipes 4” and above, glued joints have a greater tendency to leak – maybe its common that the workers don’t get enough glue (?). But when they do get adequate glue then it’s creating a rigid pipe that has more tendency to break in our moving soil around here.
I would consider a C900 installation using restrained mechanical joints to be a superior installation to glued joint 4” Sch 40. I’ve looked online for any guidance as to why gasketed pipe is not allowed in buried water distribution line but have not had any luck. I fully understand in a building. If you have some information to help me understand this I’d appreciate it.
I’ve told XXXX that with the glued joints to make darned sure they get it glued well and compact the sand with at least 6” all around or he’s going to have problems.
Now I know these folks and for sure the engineer is trying to cover for her goof. I'm going to try to contact a friend on the Tx Plumbing Board to get his opinion too.
Additionally, I can see where I might be able to approve the C900 utlitizing section 105.2 of the Code, (alternative materials). But this is not my area of expertise. I will say I'm learry of the argument the engineer is giving me. I too have an RV park and used all Sch 40 PVC for all my lines so I could throw them in the same ditch. Never had a problem in 12 years.
Opinions?
Byron