Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Unenforceablely vague language, as per the NEC Style Manual.110.12 Mechanical Execution of Work. Electrical equipment shall be installed in a neat and workmanlike manner.
That would be incorrect. This is a photo being used to learn the verbiage of the code section that applies.Jeff seems to think that this example is a violation
And that code section is???This is a photo being used to learn the verbiage of the code section that applies.
NEC 334.30, as correctly cited by Wayne in the first response to this thread.And that code section is???
One of us is confused.Cite the code violation section of the NEC
I.e. this phrasing is a red herring. The applicable code section is 334.30, but the photo is not a violation.Cite the code violation section of the NEC:
'red herring' is a very accurate description. It creates dialogue and sometimes doubt, which, in turn, makes people read the code.I.e. this phrasing is a red herring. The applicable code section is 334.30, but the photo is not a violation.
Cheers, Wayne
There, I fixed it for you.'wild goose chase' is a very accurate description
which, in turn, makes people read the code.