• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Why I Joined The Dark Side aka Building Code Enforcement (tell your story)

jar546

CBO
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
13,353
Location
Not where I really want to be
Tell your story if you want to below. I will start.

While still working as a contractor, I often helped the local building official in a city that enforced the BOCA code. That experience gave me an inside look at how building departments operated and how much the public relied on them to get things right.

As I transitioned out of contractin,g I built a very successful home inspection business. My experience and competency set me apart in a field where many inspectors were relatively inexperienced. I am not taking anything away from home inspectors as a group; there are plenty of excellent ones, but just holding an ICC certification does not automatically make someone competent.

During those years, I inspected a lot of new construction for home buyers. Time and again, I saw the same problems: building officials, inspectors, and plan examiners missing basic code requirements. I had to call or show up in person with photographs to prove violations that should have been caught without question. The mistakes were not subtle. They were fundamental.

I grew tired of the excuses and the mediocrity. People who worked hard to save for a new home, whether to raise a family, retire, or simply live their lives, were being let down. Structural deficiencies, poor waterproofing, and unsafe electrical or mechanical systems often go unnoticed for years before turning into expensive and sometimes dangerous problems.

That frustration pushed me to take the next step. I became an inspector, then a plans examiner, and ultimately a Building Official. Every industry has its share of the competent, the incompetent, and the mediocre. It was the mediocrity and outright incompetence I witnessed that drove me to become a Building Official, to hold the line, to enforce the code fairly and consistently, and to protect the people who trust that their homes will be safe and built to minimum standards.
 
Somone pointed out to me that the state was going to start enforcing the code in '04 and started classes on it. I was a handyman and was buying, fixing up houses, and selling them. I had a bad back because of the work. I did not know anything about codes, so I took some residential code classes, passed some tests and eventually got hired as an inspector, got a better paycheck and benefits and haven't had trouble with my back since.
 
This career was a curveball for me. Never would have even considered something like this. In 2015 I completed a 1-year teaching credential program thinking that I needed a career. One thing I learned from that program is that while I needed a career, it was definitely not going to be as a teacher. Subject matter was fine, tests were fine, even the kids were fine. The problem for me was the parents and the administration.

So, I went back to the cabinet shop I had worked at before. I worked primarily as an installer but could bounce around and do whatever the shop needed. I loved the work, and in many ways, I wish they could have paid enough to keep me there. After the first year back, I asked for a raise and was denied. After year two I was again denied, so I started looking around. My dad actually saw the advertisement for a "Part-Time Building Inspector Trainee" and he thought I'd be good at it. What the heck, why not give it a shot.

I got the job and discovered that there was no full-time inspector to work under, there was only a part-time, interim building official. On my first day, following my first inspection with him, I got "yelled" at for introducing myself as the trainee. He said, "You're the building inspector, sink or swim." (Paraphrased.) A week later I was on my own, performing the full spectrum of inspections, on all occupancies. Sink or swim was right. On a whim, I took the test for the residential building inspector certification after two months and passed. Shortly thereafter I was asked to work full-time.

In four years as the inspector, I worked under five different building officials. Two were "interim", one full-timer only stuck around for two weeks. Both of the other two were a year or less and moved for better pay. I did not want this job at all even though both of those two recommended me for it. After over a year since the last one left, I was asked why I wouldn't apply, and what it would take for me to consider it. I gave them a list and much to my disappointment, they checked them all off. So here I am 3-4 years later doing the "good work" mainly because no-one else would... Most of the time I'm glad I did. But sometimes I wish I could go back. It is a one-way road though...
 
This career was a curveball for me. Never would have even considered something like this. In 2015 I completed a 1-year teaching credential program thinking that I needed a career. One thing I learned from that program is that while I needed a career, it was definitely not going to be as a teacher. Subject matter was fine, tests were fine, even the kids were fine. The problem for me was the parents and the administration.
For what it's worth, it really depends on the school. My partner is a teacher and their school has a good admin and parents are very nice (very immigrant heavy, so that may play a roll). The kids are the "problem" as most of them have undiagnosed metal conditions and the parents are in denial. Makes teaching them hell.

But back on topic. I'm not often on the enforcement side (I don't work for a building department), but I am on the inspection side (CASp and CalGreen) and work with AHJs on enforcement issues on occasion. A lot of my work now can be boiled down to me "ruining" people's projects because I tell them that they need to do more accessibility work then they thought (meaning they have to do some work rather than no work) or telling them to replace or alter some faucet because the flow rate is too high.

Besides being a stickler for the rules, I became a CASp and started doing these sorts of inspections because I thought I would switch to a full-time plan review or inspector (which hasn't panned out) and I saw how pathetic the accessibility requirement in code were enforced. Two projects in particular pushed me into inspection work.

One of my first projects I ever worked on was a commercial TI. It was approved round one, no comments, permit issued. Passed all inspections, CO issued, all was good. A few years later I looked back on those plans and realized there were major accessibility issues. Really basic things that should have been caught by a plan reviewer or inspector. Things even I, a fresh graduate, shouldn't have messed up so badly. I went out to the space and measured some things and confirmed that, yes, this was a ticking timebomb, especially for the service that business provided (medical office). I'll take blame for that one, but it showed that no one who should know about accessibility actually cared enough to look at this stuff.

The other project was for another TI. We needed to add some accessible parking due to the major alterations happening. A difficult site to work on with some steep slopes where the new parking needed to be, but it could be done. Plans approved, permit issued. Client stopped talking to us, so no idea how the project went. About two or three years later, the client comes back screaming at us, saying that they're getting sued by a disabled person because the accessible parking isn't compliant. The city was also fining them daily until they fixed the issue. What we drew on the plans was compliant, but what they built was so laughably not compliant and so incredibly different than what we had on the drawings that I'm surprised that whatever inspector approved it didn't get fired. I'm talking a +15% slope with a completely different layout compared to the drawings, something very obvious if you glanced at it. How no one from the city noticed this is beyond me.

Now I go around and try to educate (annoy) all my commercial clients and help them navigate this confusing web on requirements even when the AHJs can't or won't. AHJs do a lot better now, especially in plan review, but some still struggle or don't fully understand these requirement and, more importantly, the limits to these requirements.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top