steveray
SAWHORSE
At 54" for sure....Hence why that is the gate requirement....I guess my assumption with children that young would be that it is very hard for them to defeat a locked door or window.
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
At 54" for sure....Hence why that is the gate requirement....I guess my assumption with children that young would be that it is very hard for them to defeat a locked door or window.
2015 IBC 1010.1.9.2 (exc.) permits access doors in pool barriers to be 54" max.
I get what these say but wouldn't this be contrary to egress and accessibility for paths of travel & egress. I could see it on other circulation doors but would fall back on provided that the self-latching devices are not also self-locking devices operated by means of a key, electronic opener or integral combination lock. IMO this would mean if you used key, electronic opener or integral combo lock the hardware can be mount at normal height. Been wrong before so wouldn't be the first time2015 CBC
1010.1.9.2 Hardware height. Door handles, pulls, latches, locks and other operating devices shall be installed 34 inches (864 mm) minimum and 48 inches (1219 mm) maximum above the finished floor. Locks used only for security purposes and not used for normal operation are permitted at any height.
Exception: Access doors or gates in barrier walls and fences protecting pools, spas and hot tubs shall be permitted to have operable parts of the release of latch on self-latching devices at 54 inches (1370 mm) maximum above the finished floor or ground, provided the self-latching devices are not also self- locking devices operated by means of a key, electronic opener or integral combination lock.
2019 CBC
1010.1.9.2 Hardware height. Door handles, pulls, latches, locks and other operating devices shall be installed 34 inches (864 mm) minimum and 48 inches (1219 mm) maximum above the finished floor. Locks used only for security purposes and not used for normal operation are permitted at any height.
Exception: Access doors or gates in barrier walls and fences protecting pools, spas and hot tubs shall be permitted to have operable parts of the latch release on self-latching devices at 54 inches (1370 mm) maximum above the finished floor or ground, provided that the self-latching devices are not also self-locking devices operated by means of a key, electronic opener or integral combination lock.
Several doors are exit access doors and located in the pool barriers, which is covered by the exception. I thought the plan was to provide them all with 54" hardware, and have them as self-closing and latching, but I found several that say that in one place, but not in another place, so I really have no idea what they are thinking (this is where the call to the applicant helps, see my post in the thread on code sections). Typical barrier gates offer no free access from the outside, but an interior door that must work in both directions with hardware at 54" does, so I don't see them as equivalent, and that is why I wonder if the "degree of protection not less than" language in ISPSC 305.4 #3 is meant to require them to be alarmed.I get what these say but wouldn't this be contrary to egress and accessibility for paths of travel & egress. I could see it on other circulation doors but would fall back on provided that the self-latching devices are not also self-locking devices operated by means of a key, electronic opener or integral combination lock. IMO this would mean if you used key, electronic opener or integral combo lock the hardware can be mount at normal height. Been wrong before so wouldn't be the first time![]()
Isn't UL 2017 spelled out? Part of the listing?Inspecting a indoor residential pool. They need to put all alarms on the outside on the windows and doors according to the code. Does anyone know if they make a waterproof pool alarm?
None of them are made to be weather proof for outside.Isn't UL 2017 spelled out? Part of the listing?
Not on the windows.An existing house with an existing above ground pool in back yard. New deck is being built between house and pool same level of top of pool. The deck will be in the swimming pool area. Besides the door requirement that goes to the deck would you require all the openable window less than 48" above the floor on all stories need to have alarms or a restricted opening that open to the deck?
An existing house with an existing above ground pool in back yard. New deck is being built between house and pool same level of top of pool. The deck will be in the swimming pool area. Besides the door requirement that goes to the deck would you require all the openable window less than 48" above the floor on all stories need to have alarms or a restricted opening that open to the deck?
That is sooo California .....I'm surprised to learn that another state beat us to the gut punch.All windows within the decks footprint, yes.
Most houses I see have storm doors with openable windows in them with screens. If a alarm is put on this door won't an alarm or restricted opening will also be needed for the openable window on it ?As to screen doors and main doors on the same exit, the basics become which is more likely to be closed more often? IMO the screen door is better to have the alarm, the main door is more likely to be left open during those nice days and the screen door closed. The odds of the screen door be left open vs the main door is not the norm. IMO the screen door is acting as the pool barrier gate in this regard, but with an alarm rather than 54" high latch.
This seems to include alarming the screen and the screen both on windows. Either that or the owner can chose which to alarm or restrict the opening to 4".1. Operable windows having a sill height of less than 48
inches (1219 mm) above the indoor finished floor and
doors shall have an alarm that produces an audible
warning when the window, door or their screens are
opened.
If you are going to hold hard on the second floor not having an exception, why not hold to the 4" not being there?Most houses I see have storm doors with openable windows in them with screens. If a alarm is put on this door won't an alarm or restricted opening will also be needed for the openable window on it ?
tbz, i don't know why the code did not make a limit on what stories or the height of the window would be above the swimming pool area. But they must of had a reason since it's so obvious that this this was not mentioned. I don't know studies that were done when it was decided to have no height limit. If a kid falls out of a upper story floor into a swimming pool area and I was the inspector to make sure the swimming pool barrier was to code I could be liable. Until the code changes I will enforce the code as it says.
This seems to include alarming the screen and the screen both on windows. Either that or the owner can chose which to alarm or restrict the opening to 4".
Most newer windows have tabs that can be used to restrict the opening to 4". I think this would comply.
That is sooo California .....I'm surprised to learn that another state beat us to the gut punch.
We use the story of direct egress, anything else would seem to be a lack of understanding intent of the code.We see intent written about all the time, but commonsense seems to go by the wayside.
IMO what is the alarm there to do, provide a signal if someone exits that opening. Hence for windows if they have fixed screens let's say on a casement window and the screen is wired for cutting or removal, like an alarm screen on security systems, then IMO it does not matter if the window itself triggers an alarm when it opens or not, the screen covers the exiting possibility.
As to screen doors and main doors on the same exit, the basics become which is more likely to be closed more often? IMO the screen door is better to have the alarm, the main door is more likely to be left open during those nice days and the screen door closed. The odds of the screen door be left open vs the main door is not the norm. IMO the screen door is acting as the pool barrier gate in this regard, but with an alarm rather than 54" high latch.
As to alarm needed vs not, well if the locking hardware is 54" or above, then no, if less then yes.
Now what story windows should be alarmed, the nannies will say all, commonsense you would think would be same story level or story and a half, cutting off at 2nd story.
But I have been in many AHJ that require all stories on a 1&2 family (IRC) require them, to go as far to require a fenced in pool in the enclosed back yard, because you could drop down from the deck 12ft above (No Stair Access) into the yard and then meander over to the pool. Even with the doors and windows alarmed to the deck for pool compliance, go figure.
I don't know what you mean.If you are going to hold hard on the second floor not having an exception, why not hold to the 4" not being there?