

Obviously there will be a conflict with the electrical service drop and the proposed addition. In these situations I have always asked for a temporary power pole so that the addition is not built around the service drop. I have found the drop poked through the addition roof sheathing on more than one occasion. Unfortonately I have no pictures....that may change soon.
Recently the office refused to issue a TPP permit even though I wrote a correction to install a TPP. Here is what I didn't know....for decades. Our policy is to issue a TPP under two conditions....and only two.
#1. A new building is being constructed on a bare lot.
#2. There was a fire that resulted in the service panel not being serviceable.
The case of an addition is not reason enough to issue a TPP permit because the job might be abandoned at some point. Then we may be stuck with a dwelling being energized with a TPP and no way to stop that. So we will not allow a TPP for any addition.
When I ask what procedure should commence to prevent the addition from being built around the drop, I do not get an answer.
What I get from the contractors is: "We will erect an outside wall and place a new panel in that wall." "We will do that before we build the roof so that the drop never ends up through the addition."
I have, long ago, approved such a thing only to find that they lied......or what they did was more dangerous that a drop through the addition. I can't legally endorse the new panel in a wall plan and I shouldn't be asked to go along with it. I understand that the TPP is expensive. I get that there is a delay. What I don't get is why I am expected to let any and all do whatever blows up their skirt.
Last edited: