• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

No TPP allowed

ICE

MODERATOR
Staff member
Joined
Jun 23, 2011
Messages
13,892
Location
California




Obviously there will be a conflict with the electrical service drop and the proposed addition. In these situations I have always asked for a temporary power pole so that the addition is not built around the service drop. I have found the drop poked through the addition roof sheathing on more than one occasion. Unfortonately I have no pictures....that may change soon.

Recently the office refused to issue a TPP permit even though I wrote a correction to install a TPP. Here is what I didn't know....for decades. Our policy is to issue a TPP under two conditions....and only two.
#1. A new building is being constructed on a bare lot.
#2. There was a fire that resulted in the service panel not being serviceable.

The case of an addition is not reason enough to issue a TPP permit because the job might be abandoned at some point. Then we may be stuck with a dwelling being energized with a TPP and no way to stop that. So we will not allow a TPP for any addition.

When I ask what procedure should commence to prevent the addition from being built around the drop, I do not get an answer.

What I get from the contractors is: "We will erect an outside wall and place a new panel in that wall." "We will do that before we build the roof so that the drop never ends up through the addition."

I have, long ago, approved such a thing only to find that they lied......or what they did was more dangerous that a drop through the addition. I can't legally endorse the new panel in a wall plan and I shouldn't be asked to go along with it. I understand that the TPP is expensive. I get that there is a delay. What I don't get is why I am expected to let any and all do whatever blows up their skirt.
 
Last edited:
I have seen that way too many times. In one case a new garage was built in the back yard, accessible from an alley where the OH service came from so when you walked on the garage roof, the OH lateral to the house was 6" above the peak of the garage roof.
 
$ ~ $ ~ $

Who or whom is expecting you to let any and
all do whatever blows up their skirts ? :eek:


$ ~ $ ~ $
 
$ ~ $ ~ $

Who or whom is expecting you to let any and
all do whatever blows up their skirts ? :eek:


$ ~ $ ~ $
The office manager shot down the request for a TPP so the contractor is left to do whatever. I can't allow them to install a TPP and I haven't an alternative. So what they do is what they do.
 
What I get from the contractors is: "We will erect an outside wall and place a new panel in that wall." "We will do that before we build the roof so that the drop never ends up through the addition."
At that point you issue a stop work order on all work except electrical so the electrical service can be relocated and installed as an underground service.

They can relocate the
 
They can relocate the
Service?

Would be concerned if they are dropping mud from the sky with a pumper truck for sure.

Do the plans call for the service panel to remain in it's same location or is it going to be a sub-panel?
 
Service?

Would be concerned if they are dropping mud from the sky with a pumper truck for sure.

Do the plans call for the service panel to remain in it's same location or is it going to be a sub-panel?
The plans do not include anything electrical. They never do.
 
are we really in the same state?

Not even the same planet. You know better than to ask such a silly question. Where you live and worked, the cars cost more than our houses. You pay more in fees than the entire cost of two good sized room additions in my neighborhood.

I must say that things have been picking up ever since we re-identified illegal garage conversions. The ADU was just what we needed. Now that everyone can be a landlord, we're a lot more sophisticated.
 
Back
Top