• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

R2 HighRise Type IB Construction

That's one of the problems with building codes: they cannot provide all of the possible prescriptive methods of accomplishing the same result.

The intent of Section 805 is to limit voids under combustible flooring. If a subfloor was adhered directly to the concrete floor, then I see that as being no different than a subfloor attached to sleepers constructed in accordance with Section 805.1.1.
 
That's one of the problems with building codes: they cannot provide all of the possible prescriptive methods of accomplishing the same result.

The intent of Section 805 is to limit voids under combustible flooring. If a subfloor was adhered directly to the concrete floor, then I see that as being no different than a subfloor attached to sleepers constructed in accordance with Section 805.1.1.

I agree with you because you can use sleepers but have to use blocking but plywood would eliminate blocking.
 
804.1 exempts wood flooring. I don't see any limit on the thickness of wood flooring, so the plywood could be considered part of the flooring. 805 only applies where you have voids, as RLGA and steveray pointed out..
 
804.1 exempts wood flooring. I don't see any limit on the thickness of wood flooring, so the plywood could be considered part of the flooring. 805 only applies where you have voids, as RLGA and steveray pointed out..
I agree with the principal of what you are saying, I just wouldn't go so far as to say plywood underlayment can be considered part of the flooring. Under that statement, it would appear that you'd accept plywood sheathing on bar-joists as a floor assembly because "the plywood could be considered part of the flooring".

What I'd say is that 805.1.1 permits the wood members (sleepers, bucks, and nailing blocks) for the attachment and support of floor finishes, so long as there is no concealed space wherein fire may propagate.

805.1.1 Subfloor Construction
Floor sleepers, bucks and nailing blocks shall not be constructed of combustible materials, unless the space between the fire-resistancerated floor assembly and the flooring is either solidly filled with noncombustible materials or fireblocked in accordance with Section 718, and provided that such open spaces shall not extend under or through permanent partitions or walls.

805.1.2 Wood Finish Flooring
Wood finish flooring is permitted to be attached directly to the embedded or fireblocked wood sleepers and shall be permitted where cemented directly to the top surface of fire-resistance rated floor assemblies or directly to a wood subfloor attached to sleepers as provided for in Section 805.1.1.
 
If the plywood is spanning the structural framing it is structural....Methinks you won't find a finish flooring that will span 5'...And if you do I will still call BS....If you remove it do I fall to my death? If yes, it is structural....My litmus test
 
If the plywood is spanning the structural framing it is structural....Methinks you won't find a finish flooring that will span 5'...And if you do I will still call BS....If you remove it do I fall to my death? If yes, it is structural....My litmus test
Instead of putting the plywood or finished wood flooring on sleepers, they are planning on attaching the plywood directly to the concrete slab of whatever story they are working on.
 
So, not structural so it meets construction type, so to common sense out a solution not spelled out in 602 or 3(?) i would liken it to very closely spaced sleepers.....;)....What's the diff?
 
Back
Top