jamzm
REGISTERED
Is the LVL doubled? Some of the manufacturer specs. require 2 to meet the span.
It is a single LVL. with 2x6's top & bottom and 2x6 wall framing above the door
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Is the LVL doubled? Some of the manufacturer specs. require 2 to meet the span.
What do the reviewed plans show? Ask the contractor for supporting information.
What do the reviewed plans show? Ask the contractor for supporting information.
What is the span length?
Builder won't provide drawings
Uh, that's a 2x6 wall in the picture.Ok, went back and looked at the picture again. First picture shows a 2x4 wall and the lvl is recessed quite a bit. I wonder if they installed a 1-1/2” lvl but the manufacturer load tables probably called for 3”.
Is the LVL doubled? Some of the manufacturer specs. require 2 to meet the span.
1-1/2” lvl but the manufacturer load tables probably called for 3”.
Who is in agreement that beam/header/ girder spans >16' are outside the IRC?....Getting the open floor plan 20'+ center bearing wall removal more and more and thinking about instituting a policy.....This particular one is just attic/ ceiling so like 3000# reactions so not crazy, but do you have a "longer than 16' gets a stamp" policy? Case by case on loading? All LVLs get seals? Other?...Thanks!GHR
Can you point to a Table in the IRC that allows a 16 ft opening and what size header is to be used? Bearing or non-bearing wall.
FWIW, R301.1.1 permits designs in accordance with the AWC Wood Frame Construction Manual, and that document includes header span tables for glulams, which can get you over 16'. Not sure if that's "outside the IRC," or inside the IRC by reference, but it is prescriptive.Who is in agreement that beam/header/ girder spans >16' are outside the IRC?
YepSeeing as how Jeff seems to love when people resurrect this thread......
But again...that is the SPAN.....What holds it up and how important is that to the total design?...I have had people propose LVL beams with 34,000# reactions and the PT plate fails in compression perpendicular to the grain....Stuff we shouldn't be doing....FWIW, R301.1.1 permits designs in accordance with the AWC Wood Frame Construction Manual, and that document includes header span tables for glulams, which can get you over 16'. Not sure if that's "outside the IRC," or inside the IRC by reference, but it is prescriptive.
Cheers, Wayne
My general rule of thumb, and that is all it is, is where the load exceeded 20,000lbs, I would require a post calculation. Post calculation would need to consider the plate crushing, which typically meant that the post would be continuous through the plate (plate gets strapped). (2100lbs/ply for 2x4 wall or 3,300lbs/ply for 2x6 wall).But again...that is the SPAN.....What holds it up and how important is that to the total design?...I have had people propose LVL beams with 34,000# reactions and the PT plate fails in compression perpendicular to the grain....Stuff we shouldn't be doing....
Not saying I don't pay attention below that, I just don't push for engineer's calculations until I hit 20k. (Note: 20k is the upper limit for a (3)2x6 post 10' tall at Pc100).WOW....20K?....I start paying special attention at 12K....And explain that 9K is like parking their truck on 16 square inches ish.....
The WFCM also has tables for the number of jack studs required, so it covers that as well.But again...that is the SPAN.....What holds it up and how important is that to the total design?...
Assuming braced?(Note: 20k is the upper limit for a (3)2x6 post 10' tall at Pc100).