MASSDRIVER
Registered User
It's not usage. It's storage.
Brent.
Brent.
They where forced to after removing all their water storage facilities for some fishCalifornia wisely restricts water usage more than most other states in the nation
And not very efficiently I might say........JBI said:SoCal has not been able to supply its' own potable water in adequate volume for a very long time. The fish issue is relatively new. NYC has likewise been piping/siphoning water from Upstate communities for many decades.
Not new at all, we had dams in the Sierras providing water, electricity, and recreation until The Sierra Club wackos started on a campaign to stop the building of dams and actually tear down existing dams, several are being torn down on the Oregon-California border now, every few years environmental groups start clamoring to tear down Hetch Hetchy that serves San Francisco and many surrounding communities, their first reasoning was that dams were old technology, the future was nuclear, and we should move immediately to nuclear, now they say we can't have nuclear. The environmental industry is very wealthy and powerful.View attachment 1086JBI said:SoCal has not been able to supply its' own potable water in adequate volume for a very long time. The fish issue is relatively new.
I don't know what happened but I posted this morning in Post #21 about Obamacare fining fat people in response to the toilet issue, that post has disappeared but the current Post #21 is ICE's response to my fat people post:mark handler said:Yes DickYou posts relate to the OP, a toilet room that does not meet code
ICE #21 said:
Mark:mark handler said:Obama care and water use/conservation have nothing to do with an accessible toilet.
Let's forget about the totalitarian laws, let's talking about the government enforcing the law fining fat people, if we get rid of fat people we won't have these toilet problems, much less the need for the vast majority of ADA regulations. You're the one who continually claims that laws should be enforced without discretion.mark handler said:Why dont you start a thread in off topics "totalitarian left wing laws"
No, I think everything is about which laws should be enforced and which shouldn't, or at least enforced with discretion.mark handler said:So now everything is about "fat people"?
“The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly,” Abraham Lincoln.conarb said:No, I think everything is about which laws should be enforced and which shouldn't, or at least enforced with discretion.
A gift for CONARB!!mark handler said:“The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly,” Abraham Lincoln.Continuous postings about totalitarian laws and government policies on this website, will make no change. Most of us have no control over federal and state laws and policies. I do not enforce Obama care and obamacare has NO relationship to the building codes.
Unfortunately you have nothing to add to this website so I am going to add you to my ignore list
This administration is refusing to enforce laws, if the Republicans do bring an action against the President to force him to enforce all laws it will establish a precedent that will apply to all law enforcement. Codes become laws, I am with this President on this one, I hope the Republicans do sue and I hope the President wins so we have a precedent that the executive does have discretion in enforcing laws. The current situation in Missouri is an example of tyrannical enforcement of laws without discretion.Mark said:Continuous postings about totalitarian laws and government policies on this website, will make no change. Most of us have no control over federal and state laws and policies. I do not enforce Obama care and obamacare has NO relationship to the building codes.
JBI:JBI said:conarb, The ADA predates the ICC by several years, as do many Energy Conservation Codes (NYS has had an Energy Conservation Code since the 70's). The Green Building movement would have happened with or without ICC. Flawed logic doesn't win arguments..
Speaking metaphorically of course ;-)Paul Sweet said:"Wealthy communities need service employees, where are those employees to live if not near to their employers? "Why should it be my responsibility to build them a house in order to build one for myself?