Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
I have to admit, it was worth the three days it took to come up with that.FM William Burns said:Ok....lets call them "Study Halls"![]()
I can't get you a link but the same is true for ICC.cda said:One person's opinion::::http://www.nfpa.org/publicColumn.asp?ca ... e%5Ftest=1
I can't get you a link but the same is true for ICC.Gene Boecker said:cda said:One person's opinion::::http://www.nfpa.org/publicColumn.asp?ca ... e%5Ftest=1
Glennman, 1017 says that fire resistive rated corridors shall not be interrupted by intervening rooms. It also says that foyers, lobbies and reception rooms shall not be construed as intervening rooms. If I understand you correctly, you are saying that you think the code doesn't prohibit other rooms from intervening with the fire resistance rating. Which rooms would those be?Glennman CBO said:Also, I don't believe the rooms can be construed as intervening rooms. The continuity is not interrupted even if the space doesn't exactly fit the "rooms" in the exception. The exception states that "foyers, lobbies, or reception rooms shall not be construed as intervening rooms", but that doesn't mean that these are the only rooms that aren't intervening (IMHO).
I agree. But in this forum, and in the old ICC forum, there were members who felt that as long as the intervening room was "wrapped", then it didn't need to be separated. I constantly get submittals from the Man With Pencil showing all kinds of rooms interrupting the rating of the corridor. Their argument is always, "but the rating is continuous along the back wall of the room"...cda said:2. any other room would require seperation to include rated wall and opening protection.
I agree. But in this forum, and in the old ICC forum, there were members who felt that as long as the intervening room was "wrapped", then it didn't need to be separated. I constantly get submittals from the Man With Pencil showing all kinds of rooms interrupting the rating of the corridor. Their argument is always, "but the rating is continuous along the back wall of the room"...texasbo said:cda said:2. any other room would require seperation to include rated wall and opening protection.
I didn't see "sheetrock" in IBC 2006.cda said:sheetrockibc 2006
section 1017
table 1017.1
Let's start here: Under the code, what is used to separate the corridor from other spaces?brudgers said:I agree. But in this forum, and in the old ICC forum, there were members who felt that as long as the intervening room was "wrapped", then it didn't need to be separated. I constantly get submittals from the Man With Pencil showing all kinds of rooms interrupting the rating of the corridor. Their argument is always, "but the rating is continuous along the back wall of the room"...texasbo said:cda said:2. any other room would require seperation to include rated wall and opening protection.
How do you know your feeling is correct?cda said:I feel I know a corridor when I see one.
How do you know your feeling is correct?brudgers said:cda said:I feel I know a corridor when I see one.
What it DOESN'T say is that Man With Pencil Impersonating Jailhouse Lawyer get to apply some ridiculous, twisted logic to transpose the boundary of a corridor into what is really a room.texasbo said:How do you know your feeling is correct?brudgers said:cda said:I feel I know a corridor when I see one.
What does the code actually say?