Keystone
SAWHORSE
Standard nail plates vs. manufacture ( be it wardflex, gastite, etc...) striker plates, any testing data available demonstrating strength qualities of one vs. other?
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
CSST strike plates required to be 16 gauge AISI1050 carbon Steel Hardened to Rc 45Keystone said:Standard nail plates vs. manufacture ( be it wardflex, gastite, etc...) striker plates, any testing data available demonstrating strength qualities of one vs. other?
The hard evidence is that standard 16 gauge striker plates do not have a standard that they are measured to other than 16 gauge steel, where as the ones listed as part of a listed assembly for CSST do have a standard where they are 16 gauge carbon steel heat treated to Rockwell 45.Keystone said:Greg, Francis, thanks. I do understand the requirement for the stiker plates. These CSST striker plates are the only plates tested to ANSI LC 1 / CSA standard, I would like to see/understand what the actual differences are in strenght & or puncture resistance as compared to a typical gage nail plate for say sanitary drain or similar. Looking for the hard evidence.