Darren Emery
REGISTERED
I have run across this many times during framing inspections. Back when we were under the UBC, we allowed it. The IBC/IRC is pretty clear: hanger or PE review required.
I would agree that if done well - this technique is strong. Works, and has worked for decades. The problem I've always had is - I cannot see most of the nails, I have no idea what's behind those blocks. With a hanger I can see all the nails, check the size of the the hanger, generally see all of the "work".
I have had many a framer tell me "I've done it that way for years" And my answer is always the same: "I've seen it done that way for years, and I'm not saying you didn't do a good job, I'm just saying the code doesn't recognize this as an approved method."
For better or worse, my job as an inspector is to enforce the code. I have yet to see one of those framers get involved in the code adoption process, and suggest that pressure blocking be put in the code as an accepted method. Perhaps that is expecting too much involvement in the system?
I would agree that if done well - this technique is strong. Works, and has worked for decades. The problem I've always had is - I cannot see most of the nails, I have no idea what's behind those blocks. With a hanger I can see all the nails, check the size of the the hanger, generally see all of the "work".
I have had many a framer tell me "I've done it that way for years" And my answer is always the same: "I've seen it done that way for years, and I'm not saying you didn't do a good job, I'm just saying the code doesn't recognize this as an approved method."
For better or worse, my job as an inspector is to enforce the code. I have yet to see one of those framers get involved in the code adoption process, and suggest that pressure blocking be put in the code as an accepted method. Perhaps that is expecting too much involvement in the system?
Last edited by a moderator: