Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
News reports say yes and should be.fireguy said:Not sprinkled?
Build every structure with all fireproof materials, do away with all plastics in buildings and all lightweight construction, then you don't need sprinklers and you don't have the toxic chemical problems we have now. As you know the intumescent coatings have now been outlawed because they were making people sick.cda said:So build high rises with no fire sprinklers Or build them a different way
Or limit height
double dog, you were correct!!!!!conarb said:About 10 years ago we had a fire on the top floor of a Las Vegas high rise, it's that damn styrofoam cladding they use to make them "energy efficient". Note that there were interior sprinklers here but the article doesn't say if they went off because of the heat on the exterior fire, in any event they didn't do any good as usual. As I said back in those sprinkler debates, as much as I disbelieve in interior sprinklers I believe in exterior sprinklers on any building with any type of styrofoam, either the ridged stuff behind stucco or wood cladding, or the spray foams inside the walls. All those buildings built with EIFS systems are at risk of wildfires or adjacent fires igniting the entire buildings.