• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

IRC def closet

chris kennedy

chris kennedy

ADMIN
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
1,552
Location
Miami Fla
I'm at work, could someone post the IRC def of closet please? I'm installing receptical outlets in what I would call mechanical closets in a dwelling unit for UV coil cleaners. Nothing else in said closets but AHU's. Trying to figure out if they need AFCI protection as per 2008 NEC 210.12.

Thanksd
 
Beautiful, thanks TL. Would you require AFCI protection for a rec in the application I described?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If there isn't an abundance of shelving or spare room for storage, I would say no AFCI required. A few code cycles from now may change that. I would ask for TR.
 
Pcinspector1 said:
210.12 (b) closets or similar rooms.Pc1
Click to expand...
That sure leaves the door open to require AFCI. My take on it is that a room similar to a closet would include accommodation for storage.
 
( = = )





" ...could someone post the IRC def of closet please?"
Click to expand...
Per Ch. 2, in the `06 IRC...Closet: "A small space or chamber used for storage.".........**ICE** posted

the correct definition in Post # 2.

FWIW, ...I would not require AFCI protection on a receptacle used for

your AHU.

Also FWIW, ...I am not in favor of using AFCI's in a SFR anyway........They

have not proven their worth, as was lobbied and marketed, nor could I

justify their cost. :banghd

( = = )
 
Could also defined that space as an alcove (nook, cubicle) in accordance with section M1305.1.2, but the intent of "similar rooms or areas" is to provide arc-fault protection.

210.12 Arc-Fault Circuit-Interrupter Protection.(A) Dwelling Units.

​



All 120-volt, single phase, 15- and20-ampere branch circuits supplying outlets installed in

dwelling unit family rooms, dining rooms, living rooms,

parlors, libraries, dens, bedrooms, sunrooms, recreation

rooms, closets, hallways, or similar rooms or areas shall

be protected by a listed arc-fault circuit interrupter,

combination-type, installed to provide protection of the

​
branch circuit.

Manufacturer's also note that "The 15 – 20A breakers can be used for heating, air conditioning and refrigeration equipment applications."

FWIW Virginia amended arc-fault for bedrooms only in IRC.

 
We basically afci everything but the kitchen, laundry and bath room as of the 2011. Things change in the 2014 and it will be a pita especially since the kitchen will require afci as well as the laundry. dishwasher will need gfci and afci and a refrigerator outlet within 6' of a sink will also need gfci as well as afci
 
8 = 8 = 8

Dennis ( and others ),

Has anyone, anywhere determined the actual usefulness & effectiveness

of the AFCI's, or were \ are they another [ possible ] solution in search

of a problem ?

NOTE: This post is a resurrection of a Post by **Uncle Bob** challenging the

code requirement for installing AFCI protected circuits in the SFR's.



8 = 8 = 8
 
Well I don't know but I've been told that AFCI is a waste of money.

I encountered a house that had been gutted and rewired, including a new service. This was done without permits and the electrical work was covered without inspection. All in all, the work looked professional enough for the girls I run with. I required a few spots to be exposed and found nail plates.

I gave them the choice to expose all of the electrical wiring or install ARC faults breakers on everything. They chose the ARC fault protection. It was found that a drywall installer screwed the pooch and hit a cable because he missed the stud completely.

It has been a good 10 years since then. I know better now and would not do such a thing as that again.

Not all arcs are equal. Some types go undetected by arc fault breakers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dennis said:
Well I think afci do help and I believe there have been studies that support this. There had to be some substantiation for the cmp members to expand the use of afci. Sure the mfg have their hands in it also but I do think they help. http://esfi.org/index.cfm/cdid/12693/pid/10262
Click to expand...
I'm in the camp that don't think there useful in a residential setting. In commercial and industrial settings where higher voltages are involved Arc Faults are significant problem but in residential settings I really don't see a need for them. Many of the new code requirements seem like they are as mentioned earlier solutions looking for a problem and are extremely expensive compared to their worth.
 
Well I have seen them work however since all afci breakers have 30ma gfci built in, except GE, it is sometimes the gfci doing the work but that is a totally different function. IMO the afci is a pita but it has its merits. We can think what we want but I believe it would help if the statement below is true.

According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), an alarming 46,500 home structure fires involved an electrical failure or malfunction in 2010. These fires resulted in 420 deaths, more than 1,500 injuries, and $1.5 billion in direct property damage. Arc faults, a dangerous condition caused by overheated or stressed electrical wiring or devices, are the cause of more than half of the reported electrical fires. - See more at: http://esfi.org/index.cfm/cdid/12693/pid/10262#sthash.1QKNE2YM.dpuf
Click to expand...
How do you know AFCIs will prevent fires and save lives? Since 1999, AFCIs have been thoroughly field-tested. Underwriters Laboratories, the National Association

of State Fire Marshals (NASFM), the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, and many other experts

have found AFCIs to be reliable and effective. By eliminating a significant source of electrically related

fires, future statistics will demonstrate a reduction in fires of electrical origin.
Click to expand...
 
$ = = = $

A question then becomes, how does an competent Code Official make

an accurate determination of the components, when the various

entities [ i.e. - the NFPA, ...ICC, ...the various manufacturers,

...the myriad of lobbyists, ...the Fire Service community, and on and

on and on ], all have their own agendas, to promote and sell their

desires, at the cost of the final end users... the occupants of the

structures, ...regardless of if they are actually needed or not.

$ = = = $
 
north star said:
$ = = = $A question then becomes, how does an competent Code Official make

an accurate determination of the components, when the various

entities [ i.e. - the NFPA, ...ICC, ...the various manufacturers,

...the myriad of lobbyists, ...the Fire Service community, and on and

on and on ], all have their own agendas, to promote and sell their

desires, at the cost of the final end users... the occupants of the

structures, ...regardless of if they are actually needed or not.

$ = = = $
Click to expand...
Simply by following the code. It is really not mine or your place to decide if afci work or not or if they are worth the money. I agree mfg are a big part of it.. I am waiting for a real study that shows the success rate of the afci. Heck if it saves one home and 1 life it seems worth it but I feel certain it has a better success rate than that.
 
~ ~ & ~ ~

The time has already arrived whereby Code Officials are

already questioning the [ actual ] effectiveness and need

of some components in the built environment.......In the

case of AFCI's, it my sincere belief that they are not

needed and done nothing to save lives........As you already

know, ...statistical data can be manipulated to state

anything to the benefit of the one providing them.

I am not against saving lives **Dennis**, ...I just have

not seen actual reports \ data that substantiates the

need; not desire, for the AFCI's...........To this end,

some Code Officials are amending out the AFCI's from

their adopted codes language.......Apparently, there is

historical data \ evidence for some Code Officials to

believe that there are some things in the various codes

that do not provide a relevant "Cost \ Benefit" ratio

to keep the components in their adopted codes........It

is not a widespread belief, but some Code Officials

ARE looking a lot closer at what they are

recommending to be adopted !



~ ~ & ~ ~
 
IMO, the code officials are looking at the cost base of the units and how it may affect construction cost. It is all political no matter what side of the fence you are on.
 
north star said:
To this end, some Code Officials are amending out the AFCI's from their adopted codes language
Click to expand...
They really shouldn't be doing that. Not that I am a straight and narrow proponent of toeing the company line but this is the electrical code. Government officials have virtually no legitimate method to amend code other than the fine line given by code.

Were this not the electrical code my attitude would lean towards live and let live. The el. code is brought to us by experts that we must trust but verify. The codes we are given must be adhered to whether we like it or not. That's the trust. We can question and argue the code all we want. That's the verify. Various government officials that delete code are not the expert charged with formulating code. Those government officials may not be expert in anything and have no right to toss out code. They lack trust. They are too impatient.

That seems odd coming from me. I have not lost track of who I am or what I have done. The codes that I have tossed?.....well I can only remember a few and they weren't electrical. I mostly add a few now and then.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dennis said:
According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), an alarming 46,500 home structure fires involved an electrical failure or malfunction in 2010. These fires resulted in 420 deaths, more than 1,500 injuries, and $1.5 billion in direct property damage. Arc faults, a dangerous condition caused by overheated or stressed electrical wiring or devices, are the cause of more than half of the reported electrical fires. - See more at: http://esfi.org/index.cfm/cdid/12693....1QKNE2YM.dpuf
Click to expand...
I find this statement interesting because overheating and stressed wiring should be detected by breakers and fuses not AFCI's!
 
A breaker will detect heat if it is generated at the breaker location but a small arc may not be detected by a breaker until it is too late. A fire can start before a standard breaker trips while an afci should or has more of a possibility to trip then a standard breaker.
 
Msradell said:
I find this statement interesting because overheating and stressed wiring should be detected by breakers and fuses not AFCI's!
Click to expand...
That's correct when due to an overload (excessive amperage) that would exceed the fuse or breaker rating however in the context of the article the heat is generated from an arc (voltage) jumping across a poor connection or broken wire.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top