jar546
CBO
The biggest problem I have with this is that it is not fully nailed. I am not even sure that Simpson, USP or whoever even makes a hangar for older, rough sawn lumber without a special order.

Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Absolutely. I asked that they sister the joist for about 12" and secure it.kyhowey said:If the block was longer and nailed to the existing joist, I would have no problems with it.
Block needs to be 2x2 minimum for a structural application. Straps, or other connectors could be applied to deal with applicable spreading or uplift forces.steveray said:I have used some full 2" hangers from simpson....but that was a while back in an old mill town where there was alot of older structures fit for remodeling....
2305.1.2.1 [ibc 2006]keystone said:agreed, adding a sister joist would appear practical. Burdgers - "block needs to be 2x2 minimum for structural application." for my own knowledge, what source would be used to make that determination, irc/ibc, mii, rdp?
GCtony said:Can't tell for sure but those nails don't look like the correct nails.Before the days of Simpson (proud sponsor of the IRC) We used to rip 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" (or larger) legders, notch and toe nail the joist. Does code still allow this practice?
Yes you can but that has its' own set of problems. The "re-entrant corner", the corner at the inside edge of the joist notch often enough ends up with a horizontal split where the notch causes the shear stress to concentrate. The ledger is designed and thought of as having the nails in shear. A 2x2 ledger fails by rolling off the girder rather than sliding down in shear. The nails are actually in something between shear and withdrawal.GCtony said:Can't tell for sure but those nails don't look like the correct nails.Before the days of Simpson (proud sponsor of the IRC) We used to rip 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" (or larger) legders, notch and toe nail the joist. Does code still allow this practice?
Sorry Tony,GCtony said:Can't tell for sure but those nails don't look like the correct nails.Before the days of Simpson (proud sponsor of the IRC) We used to rip 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" (or larger) legders, notch and toe nail the joist. Does code still allow this practice?