globe trekker
REGISTERED
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2009
- Messages
- 1,739
post deleted by globe trekker
Last edited by a moderator:
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Sue:Sue said:We did fiind out that they do have a mortgage on the home so we are hoping that the bank might just take a hand in the process.
Going to the bank isn't the building department's call either - nor is rallying the insurance adjuster.FredK said:LIke evenme said you should be able to get the name of the lien holder from the county. Include them in the process with any letter to the owner. Not sure if you have an building abatement or a fire issue, but at this point the fire issue is the foremost. Here we get a copy of the issurance report as to the damage and will inspect those areas. Many times also included is a structural engineer's report if truss/walls are damaged. And the homeowner can do the work if so desired.
As to the kids and how they live while it's an issue it's not our call.
I think any search of this page for "jail" indicates quite the opposite:peach said:Brud..I don't recall typing that we should criminalize mental illness... crazy parents or just bad parents, need to get the kids out of the situation at least temporarily.
No need to get the bank "involved"... just notify them that you intend to tear down a property in which they have a vested interest.. it's part of that pesky due process clause.
But you really top yourself in your self-righteous crusade for the children's welfare - not only do you send them off to live with strangers, throw their parents and cousins in jail, and destroy their home - but also turn their mother against the rest of the family.that'll get their attention (not only is the home no longer going to be there.. they will have a new dwelling - jail).
If you've actually done this sort of thing before, there's special place in hell.Depending on how bonded parents are to children, you can get ongoing compliance quickly... maybe.Mom, Dad, cousins, whoever may well be sitting in jail, so there's no one to oppose the condemnation proceedings. Get an order (most judges will give them 30 days to start compliance.. which they can't do from jail)... hire a demo company and bye-bye house.
In most cases, Mom (now in jail) is going to sing like a bird to implicate everyone but herself
Have the CalFire report for this one, they said it was electrical. The garage fire was undetermined if I remember correctly. With the amount of junk in the garage, I think that this is why they called it undetermined. Unfortunately, we have a multiple problem incident - lots of 'stuff' + 'poor electrical' = a huge mess.FyrBldgGuy said:Alias, you indicated that previous fires were investigated by CalFire. Go up the chain of command at CalFire and get a full investigation into this property. Multiple fires involving electrical hazards would indicate a pattern. If CalFire can determine that a sprinkler system can blow up a house then maybe they can determine that multiple fires of the same pattern is a potential arson case. If necessary call Tonya.
Wow...I didn't think someone could actually equate unwed mothers with someone kills their children and places them in a freezer. That's got to be an internet record of some sort.peach said:Brud..When you see children killed by the parent and stuffed into a freezer, you'll understand why some children are just better off not living with mom and dad.. with their filth and needles.
Child abuse is a crime. Period.
Not only is it criminal, it creates a pattern that the child WILL likely repeat.
I worked very closely with a charter school for unwed moms... they lived during the week at the school learning life lessons, job skills, child care, budgeting, etc., in addition to their HS classes. 100% of these unwed moms were children of unwed moms. They grew up on welfare, in abusive homes. The school helped some of them break that pattern of behavior.
This coming from the poster boy for the non-sequitor, who can't pass up the chance to reference racism and slavery when others are discussing the ridiculousness of handicapped accessibility legislation...brudgers said:Wow...I didn't think someone could actually equate unwed mothers with someone kills their children and places them in a freezer. That's got to be an internet record of some sort.On the other hand, I'm not surprised that it comes from a person who segways from criminals to unwed mothers as if it were something other than an utter non-sequitor.
Yeah right.jim baird said:The New Yorker had a good story some weeks ago about a family practice clinic in Oakland whose med director is a Carribean born ball of fire focusing, in her spare time, on research that tries to develop a case for "adverse childhood experience" as being a public health problem much like smoking, obesity, and other environmental factors. Such adverse experience might include domestic violence, drug abuse, child and sexual abuse, and living conditions like those Alias posted pictures of.