Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
My guess is that not using one's seal increases one's liability exposure because it can be construed as knowing one did not use the proper standard of care.TimNY said:Not that I don't trust insurance companies or anything.. But I can foresee that in the event of a claim the insurance company will state that since you did not use the stamp nor the number it was a personal opinion; you were not acting in a capacity of a licensed professional; your professional liability policy will not cover the problem.But, not all insurance companies are evil. I think.![]()
That makes sense to mebrudgers said:My guess is that not using one's seal increases one's liability exposure because it can be construed as knowing one did not use the proper standard of care.
Please submit the name of one that is not.One of the current or former Forum members had an excellent "tag line"...But, not all insurance companies are evil. I think. :smile: