Francis Vineyard
Registered User
334.34Where will I find that?
334.34Where will I find that?
Can get you a contact next week when I return to work.I called Southwire several times today and did not get an answer.
I'm seeing what appears to be rippling of the insulation on the opposite side of the punctures . . .The insulation damage in the original photo is not because of bending the wire. Rather it is because of the tool used to bend the wire.
I would appreciate that.Can get you a contact next week when I return to work.
There is no 334.34 in the California Electrical Code.334.34
334.24There is no 334.34 in the California Electrical Code.
Did the bend make it pucker?The insulation is puckers on one side and torn on the other. I suspect that pliers was used to complete the bend and that tore the insulation.
That is for cable.334.24
True and so is 338, but you did ask about wire.That is for cable.
And I appreciate your interest. I am stuck with finding a code for individual conductors.True and so is 338, but you did ask about wire.
No. I found this at an inspection of PV. The panel is new and bootlegged. There’s plenty wrong with it and I will be seeing it again. It is never easy to find labels on wire but I’ll try.Do you happen to have the brand
All Southwire has to say is don't damage the cable.I hadn’t thought about that. Perhaps Southwire has an opinion.
The damage occurs when the radius of the metal inside the sheathing" Exactly what is the damage? Is it damage to the insulation or the metal?
When does damage ensue ? "
Send me an email if you want his phone number: http://abernathypaul.wixsite.com/masterthenec/founderAnd I appreciate your interest. I am stuck with finding a code for individual conductors.