ICE
Oh Well
My employer led me to believe that I would be reimbursed for expenses related to re-certification. Back then, a test was required. That meant buying the code books because the jurisdiction is always a few code cycles behind. Five code books and five tests. I submitted the receipts and was paid $25.00 When I inquired about the disparity I was told "Certifications don't mean anything" "They are required to be hired but certifications do not guarantee competence"
One would think that the testament to an inspectors competence would be the fact that the person was hired to perform as an inspector. After all, who would hire a person that lacks competence in the codes? As it turns out, that would be my employer. During the hiring process I was not asked a code question..not one. I asked the interview panel why they had not asked any code questions and they replied that they wouldn't know what to ask.
One would think that the testament to an inspectors competence would be the fact that the person was hired to perform as an inspector. After all, who would hire a person that lacks competence in the codes? As it turns out, that would be my employer. During the hiring process I was not asked a code question..not one. I asked the interview panel why they had not asked any code questions and they replied that they wouldn't know what to ask.
Last edited by a moderator: