• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

AFCI/GFCI for Dishwasher

jar546

CBO
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
12,746
Location
Not where I really want to be
If an electrician fails a final inspection because the dishwasher is not AFCI/GFCI protected as per the 2014 NEC, can he buy a combo AFCI/GFCI receptacle and install it and be compliant?
 
2014NEC, 210.8 (d) requires GFCI's for dishwashers
2014NEC, 210.12 (a) requires AFCI's

I would say yes as the AHJ.
2014NEC, 90.4 Enforcement. allows new products or materials that may not have been ready at time of adoption. If the electrician meets the code using the combo versus the breaker he is meeting the intent of the code for safety and I would allow the combo's use.
 
Maybe...maybe not. If the branch circuit wiring is in a raceway up to the receptacle outlet, an AFCI receptacle would be permitted.
 
Maybe...maybe not. If the branch circuit wiring is in a raceway up to the receptacle outlet, an AFCI receptacle would be permitted.

Correct....Not likely but possible....As a wiring method was not specified, I gave the best answer possible...
 
2014NEC, 210.8 (d) requires GFCI's for dishwashers
2014NEC, 210.12 (a) requires AFCI's

I would say yes as the AHJ.
2014NEC, 90.4 Enforcement. allows new products or materials that may not have been ready at time of adoption. If the electrician meets the code using the combo versus the breaker he is meeting the intent of the code for safety and I would allow the combo's use.

In the absence of RMC, IMC, EMT, Type MC from the branch OCPD to the first device, there is no compliance. In this case if this were NM cable this would not meet the code nor the "intent" of the code and it is a violation.
 
Back
Top