Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Including ICC staff and WebTech I would say there were around 40 of us at the meeting.ewenme said:JP: How many people actually attended?
I believe there were 10??? from this board.ewenme said:Any that were not part of this board?
Yes there were others from various boards. Architecture boards, NAHB, Engineer forums etc.ewenme said:Any from other boards?
There is more going on than just the forum. From what I understand there is going to be an entire revamping of the ICC web site. As far as the forum goes from what I understand they (ICC) is going to incorporate the old board into the new board. They know they screwed up and are trying to fix their screw up.ewenme said:When you compare how long it took Jeff to set up this board, and how long it will be before the ICC gets the 'newer and more improved' ICC Board up and running, you get the feeling that bureaucracy can only slow things down to a crawl rivaling molasses uphill in January.
Mule, that sounds about right. Some ofus also wear multiple hats.Mule said:Among the attendees were Building Officials/3rd party official (peach), 10 or 12
Inspectors, 3 or 4
Fire Official 1 I think
Architects, 2 or 3
Engineers 2 0r 3
Home Builders 2
Independent companies 2
Student 1
hello jpranch i was the youngster student at the metting in dia i want to ssay thank you for your time and addvicejpranch said:Stuck in DIA. Beer 5.50 a glass! Fatboy, this ones for you. Need a little time to digest everything. Uncle Bob, I' call you soon. Very happy to know all is well.
Some more than others.mtlogcabin said:Thats okay jp some of us needed to be reminded of the TRUTH every now and then.![]()