Yikes
SAWHORSE
Hypothetical Example: a DPOR’s concrete floor plan shows a #4 @ 16” o/c each way in the slab, and a separate standard detail for the slab edge and perimeter footing shows the end of that rebar turning down forming a hook around another bar in the continuous footing. The slab is shaped with a 45 degree angle at one end in plan view, so the horizontal slab rebars need to be fabricated at different lengths.
The shop drawing created by the sub shows each individual rebar, its length, the and the location of the bends and hooks. This shop drawing is not adding any new design information, it is merely combining the information already shown and approved by the AHJ on 2 separate drawings (the plan and the detail), restating it in a single profile drawing of each rebar so the shop worker can follow a its pattern when bending the bar.
This shop drawing should not require review by the AHJ, because there is no additional design information being generated by this shop drawing. It is only about fabrication technique. The DPOR will review it to confirm the DPOR’s plan and the detail have been successfully mated together to match the design intent. The DPOR will not check the length of each individual rebar.
In the example above, the shop drawing was showing important structural information, but it did not require AHJ review. My point is this: the requirement for an AHJ to review a shop drawing should not be determined by whether they care about the drawing, it should be determined by whether the shop drawing is providing new code-related design information that was not otherwise already previously represented in some other format on the original approved plans.
The shop drawing created by the sub shows each individual rebar, its length, the and the location of the bends and hooks. This shop drawing is not adding any new design information, it is merely combining the information already shown and approved by the AHJ on 2 separate drawings (the plan and the detail), restating it in a single profile drawing of each rebar so the shop worker can follow a its pattern when bending the bar.
This shop drawing should not require review by the AHJ, because there is no additional design information being generated by this shop drawing. It is only about fabrication technique. The DPOR will review it to confirm the DPOR’s plan and the detail have been successfully mated together to match the design intent. The DPOR will not check the length of each individual rebar.
In the example above, the shop drawing was showing important structural information, but it did not require AHJ review. My point is this: the requirement for an AHJ to review a shop drawing should not be determined by whether they care about the drawing, it should be determined by whether the shop drawing is providing new code-related design information that was not otherwise already previously represented in some other format on the original approved plans.
Last edited: