Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Hideous fits.Technically this is overkill, but correct
That the good stuff! You gotta protect that attitude adjustment elixir my friend!I make sure that the Crown Royal is secure for the ride from Costco to the truck.
ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 406.12 says Detectable Warnings shall extend the full width of the marked crossing. So if there is no marked crossings they are not required.Mr. Inspector, I am not sure what jurisdiction you are in but I am unaware of any flush sidewalk to vehicular way condition that would not require detectable warnings.
ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 does not require markings but section 406 requires Detectable Warnings are required only at Raised Marked Crossings only. Not sure why raised crossings are under 406 "Curb Ramps" when they are not curb ramps.That is not the intent of the code. where does the code say that markings are required? detectable warnings are required in your condition