fatboy
Administrator
I would say the speedy trial issue would be based on who is dragging it out.......
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Thanks for the info. It appears he has court appointed lawyers, dragging it out to give them time to figure a defence?jpranch said:
He is entitled to the status of innocent until proven guilty. He is perhaps the only suspect, but short of a confession in conjunction with other evidence, it will be tough to convict him. His best move is to get a trial by a judge, not a jury.Rider Rick said:Tiger,If Paul didn't kill her who did?
Why is he innocent? I'm not saying he is guilty, but for whatever reason, they seem to have secured/observed some evidence that made it worthwhile to bring it forward again.conarb said:This was on AOL this morning. He's got to be innocent.
Of course nobody but Paul knows, when taking moot court in law school we were taught that "all criminal defendants are guilty", prosecutors are under a lot of political pressure to solve cases, many times if they can't pin it on somebody they will go after whomever they can, even if they at times convict innocent people. with DNA evidence today The Innocence Project has found many convicted people to be innocent.Fatboy said:Why is he innocent? I'm not saying he is guilty, but for whatever reason, they seem to have secured/observed some evidence that made it worthwhile to bring it forward again.