• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

An average day

The conductors are feeders and I've never seen such a thing before. It wasn't easy to do and it won't be easy to undo. This is emblematic of the dismal state of the electrical trade in California.
 
The conductors are feeders and I've never seen such a thing before. It wasn't easy to do and it won't be easy to undo. This is emblematic of the dismal state of the electrical trade in California.
Is there actually a code section that would prohibit that?
 
Is there actually a code section that would prohibit that?

300.34 Conductor Bending Radius. The conductor shall not be bent to a radius less than 8 times the overall diameter for nonshielded conductors or 12 times the overall diameter for shielded or lead-covered conductors during or after installation. For multiconductor or multiplexed single-conductor cables having individually shielded conductors, the minimum bending radius is 12 times the diameter of the individually shielded conductors or 7 times the overall diameter, whichever is greater.
 
The conductors are feeders and I've never seen such a thing before. It wasn't easy to do and it won't be easy to undo. This is emblematic of the dismal state of the electrical trade in California.

Wow this coiled up stuff!
wire from table 5A (examples)
#4 of various types has a diameter of 0.335 so 8x =2.68"
#2 of various types has a diameter of 0.39 so 8x =3.12"
1/0 of various types has a diameter of 0.5 so 8x =4"

So to follow up please - did you share with the utility company to not serve the property? I wonder what would actually occur under a full load?
 
The inspection was for windows. The apartments are being remodeled. The last inspection (another inspector) resulted in a correction asking that the drywall be removed so a mep inspection can be performed. Thankfully, I was there only for windows.

49620100736_b3b30c1dc9_b.jpg

49619586993_669d584b87_b.jpg

I asked the contractor if the window flashing, attachment and lath was inspected before the plaster was applied and he said no. Then he told me that it was done two years ago and it has been through two rainy seasons without any leaks.
 
Last edited:
This is emblematic of the dismal state of the electrical trade in California.
But you know what ... that electrician tried to put some pride in his work, make it look neat. He obviously wasn’t in a hurry to get’er done and on to the next one. I hope you let him down easy.
 
But you know what ... that electrician tried to put some pride in his work, make it look neat. He obviously wasn’t in a hurry to get’er done and on to the next one. I hope you let him down easy.

I didn't let him down at all. I was there for a drywall inspection. It was my first and last visit to that site. Other inspectors have seen this and the rough electrical has been approved. I am taking a month long vacation so that job should be completed before I return.....if not, well then I will have to deal with it.
 
A month long vacation!

The way these kids operate now, when you get back your office will be in the basement back by the breaker panels!

Enjoy your vacation, go see jar in FL!
 
Ok ... not part of Ice’s work, but i didnt want to start a new discussion.

I take part in a tile forum. Very knowledgeable folks when it comes to tile, not so much for other things. One guy posted about damage from a leaking shower wall, showed a picture of the wall with sheetrock removed. 2x4 wood framing, stucco exterior. There was a let-in 1x4 diagonal brace on the exterior side of the studs that had suffered badly, he had cut off about a 24” piece right where it crossed a stud. He was asking if he could cut a piece to fit and slip it in place.

I pointed out that the 1x4 needed to be continuous from top plate to sill for structural integrity, and suggested that he either chip away the stucco and replace it completely, or add a metal strap on the inside, again from top to bottom. His response: too much trouble.
 
Ok ... not part of Ice’s work, but i didnt want to start a new discussion.

I take part in a tile forum. Very knowledgeable folks when it comes to tile, not so much for other things. One guy posted about damage from a leaking shower wall, showed a picture of the wall with sheetrock removed. 2x4 wood framing, stucco exterior. There was a let-in 1x4 diagonal brace on the exterior side of the studs that had suffered badly, he had cut off about a 24” piece right where it crossed a stud. He was asking if he could cut a piece to fit and slip it in place.

I pointed out that the 1x4 needed to be continuous from top plate to sill for structural integrity, and suggested that he either chip away the stucco and replace it completely, or add a metal strap on the inside, again from top to bottom. His response: too much trouble.
Yeah.... let-in bracing is a portion of the lateral resistance for wind and seismic forces. This is a problem that should be fixed. Hopefully a permit has been pulled and someone like ICE does an inspection and points out the heartache this wannabe has caused.
 
Ok ... not part of Ice’s work, but i didnt want to start a new discussion.

I take part in a tile forum. Very knowledgeable folks when it comes to tile, not so much for other things. One guy posted about damage from a leaking shower wall, showed a picture of the wall with sheetrock removed. 2x4 wood framing, stucco exterior. There was a let-in 1x4 diagonal brace on the exterior side of the studs that had suffered badly, he had cut off about a 24” piece right where it crossed a stud. He was asking if he could cut a piece to fit and slip it in place.

I pointed out that the 1x4 needed to be continuous from top plate to sill for structural integrity, and suggested that he either chip away the stucco and replace it completely, or add a metal strap on the inside, again from top to bottom. His response: too much trouble.

A rotten 24" section of 1"x4" brace is no better than a missing section of brace. Had the brace not been removed, I would not have an issue with it. Now that the 24 inches of brace has been removed, I would not have an issue with that either.

This being a shower wall the rot may not be spread out but once you start removing stucco you may find rot here, there and everywhere. There's houses out there that are being held up by the stucco.
 
Last edited:
Ok ... not part of Ice’s work, but i didnt want to start a new discussion.

I take part in a tile forum. Very knowledgeable folks when it comes to tile, not so much for other things. One guy posted about damage from a leaking shower wall, showed a picture of the wall with sheetrock removed. 2x4 wood framing, stucco exterior. There was a let-in 1x4 diagonal brace on the exterior side of the studs that had suffered badly, he had cut off about a 24” piece right where it crossed a stud. He was asking if he could cut a piece to fit and slip it in place.

I pointed out that the 1x4 needed to be continuous from top plate to sill for structural integrity, and suggested that he either chip away the stucco and replace it completely, or add a metal strap on the inside, again from top to bottom. His response: too much trouble.
HAHA! I am on that forum and saw that post..............crazy response.......but he is there to fix the tile issue, who needs lateral bracing
 
Building owners should invest in private inspections.

49628895992_e6ed038c54_b.jpg

49628104233_3f7ec480b3_b.jpg

49628114593_fc40f5670d_b.jpg

One way to kill the bearings on a fan is to tilt it. When the bearings go things get hot. When that overheating fan is on a roof nobody hears the screeching. The redeeming feature of a roof mount is that passersby will see the flames.

49628646426_87a326b584_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
The job is extending the rear of the house 12'. That includes the kitchen and two bedrooms. Permits were pulled in 2002 and we are now trying to final the job with a new permit. I was there for the first time trying to perform a final inspection. Several other inspectors have been there before me and have approved the framing, electrical and plumbing.

I had not gone inside yet as I started with the water heater. I wanted to see the water heater vent so I stood on a block wall for a planter.

49628670511_f1a7d9edf4_b.jpg

That's when I noticed the service drop.

49628670581_e7cc1e7f1d_b.jpg

The panel is above a couch in the living room.

49628942062_c0a5f674f1_b.jpg

The cover will not close and there is no deadfront.

49628969217_b1cbf405c4_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top