Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
What would you say is the estimated cost from a plan review screen, review software, permitting software, field I-pads etc.?
Since do not see a edit button, forgot to comment about the fine roof jack install, & roof shingle patching, comp roofs are pretty easy to do a nice job cutting in roof jacks into, which they failed miserably by using wet patch, & mixing architectural & 3-tab shingles is always a nice touch,a nightmare for whoever paid a large sum to have it done.
Well then, it appears that the person in charge has overstepped their bounds with this one. While there are ways to go about transforming some service panels to a sub-panel, not entirely legal mind you but there are ways.....This is not one of them. Does anyone know of a UL listing for a meter socket bypass. What Standard would apply? I am not 100% sure that there is no listed meter socket bypass. I am convinced that if there is...one, it's not this one and two, it would be for a temporary use.Those meter main panels are usually listed for use as service equipment only, with a permanently bonded neutral, so am assuming someone added the insulated neutral. You going to let it fly? What did they use to jumper the meter jaws? Have seen a kit made for the purpose but was not insulated.
Looks like the mast used to be to the right and lower than the current location. About where the half-moon cut is in the shingle. And then they used 3-tab to patch the old hole., forgot to comment about the fine roof jack install,
I think milbank makes one...ran across it once....Does anyone know of a UL listing for a meter socket bypass. What Standard would apply? I am not 100% sure that there is no listed meter socket bypass. I am convinced that if there is...one, it's not this one and two, it would be for a temporary use.
Mtlog,Shouldn't the wire with the red marking be on the left and the black on the right isn't that the correct way to do it? Not sure if it is code or just industry standard
View attachment 7245
Are the load conductors still entering the box too high on the wall of the box? I vaguely remember there being a manufacturer rule about that, but I could be confused.The first inspection revealed four conduit punched through the top endwall.
View attachment 7263
The last line says that this is not permitted. So did the correction that I wrote.
View attachment 7264
At the next inspection I found their idea of a fix.
View attachment 7266
When I asked to see what was used to seal the top I was shown plastic plugs. Within short order the workman was shouting at me. I ended the face time call and within five minutes I got a call from my office manager. It seems that In have upset a contractor.
Technically, the listing of the 3R enclosure has been voided. I say technically because if you ask Schneider Electric for a letter they will tell you that the manufacturer provided a sufficient number of knockouts and drilling/punching holes voids the 3R listing. If you just ask Schneider for an opinion without a letter you get a different answer. As long as the 3R feature is maintained with rain-tight entries they are forgiven the fact that it voids a listing.Are the load conductors still entering the box too high on the wall of the box? I vaguely remember there being a manufacturer rule about that, but I could be confused.