Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
in reality very seldom does a contractor have an engineer design the shoring system. That only happens in very rare circumstances where something is out of the norm. Most contractors have a person trained for shoring design or train themselves. This is allowed under OSHA standards and is what the normal procedure is in most areas. Contractors don't have time to wait around for an engineer to design shoring which is only temporary in nature.On any real construction project, the contractor would have an engineer design the shoring system or determine if shoring is even needed.
The job is a remodel. The steel beam is shown as "existing header" on the plans. The rafters on both sides are new, as is the header in the distance. The I-beam is 6"x6"x16'. The engineer has approved this work via a Structural Observation form. I asked the contractor if the engineer performed calculations on the I-beam and he said yes but he lacked proof. I asked that the engineer do it again.
I mentioned the strap and was told that the engineer required it because the top plates do not overlap. That was easy to accept but asking for 36 nails on each side of CS20 seems odd.
I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place; what do I do about my own mistakes? When I find something that I missed am I allowed to write that correction after the fact?....I think not.
...
I blew it again last week when I found a sub-panel in a bathroom at the final of a new dwelling. Wait a minute here....that might be deadly....or not....I suppose it's a matter of how loud the contractor gets with the manager. He was plenty loud with me: "You are the fifth inspector to see it and none of the others said anything".
I've found things I should have caught on a previous inspection. It's a real humble pie moment when I have to explain to a contractor I made a mistake and missed it. They always fix it though...
BiG Drag
2016 CA energy code §150.0(k)7 Residential Compliance Manual=6.6.4to find these in the California codes.
1. "Attic light shall be equipped with a vacancy sensor.".....
Res and Non-Res linkWell there you go Mark. An attic is an "other room". Thanks for that. I think I'll ask for dimmers.
Could you shoot me a link for the commercial manual. I'd like to add that to my website as well.
This could ruin the department for decades. Well who am I kidding, the dept is on the skids and has been for a long time. Those same inspectors that will be hired have been at it for years.
Money is not an issue. Not even close.I think this is true most places...I blame it on poor staffing/ funding around here...No one sees the effects of the cuts for years, so it is not a problem...
I enjoy certain protections. Such as civil service rules and a union.ICE I feel your frustration. I work for a 3rd party inspection agency. Where I work 3rd party electrical inspectors from other companies can be used or in one township must be used even though I am a certified electrical inspector. I see a lot of electrical work that I would not pass but I am not allowed to say anything about it if it is passed by the other 3rd party inspector. In the municipal where other 3rd party electrical inspectors are required I am required to pass footing inspections with rebar in them with no electrical inspection for the grounding of the rebar. I was told to just look for the rough and final electrical inspection sticker and act like I don't know anything about electrical codes. So if a house has an electrical update I need blinders and just check the sticker and test the smoke alarms.