• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

An average day

I use to spray a similar, if not the same product on homes that acted to treat against rot and provide termite treatment at the same time. It was made for all areas close to the soil. It is called Bora-Care or that is the product that I used and mixed it in hot water with a marking dye, greenish blue in color. The stuff works great.

The internet says that Bora Care is not toxic to humans or pets. I hope that's what was used.
 
The reason that it is corroded has to do with a watering system that's meant to clean the face of the modules.]
Do you make them clean the corrosion off the connectors when it is reassembled? Use anti-ox goop on the connections?
 
This was done by a large mechanical contractor. This company produces some outlandish results. I suspect that their advertising sells work faster than they can hire competent workmen.

48596014147_57fb01d1e0_b.jpg

The clearance is 31" top, 5" side, 5" rear and not enough between them.

48595875916_9921ce77b9_b.jpg

48596013822_9609db7693_b.jpg

I didn't open a disconnect but it's a good bet that there are fuses. That would qualify the disconnects for a working space violation. Yes that's right, no fuses, no breakers means no working space required. You must understand that when Lewis and Clark made the trip they brought along a can-do spirit that has lasted even to this day.
 
Train wrecks result in posts, if photos of perfect construction were to appear, not much to comment on. Nothing to see here, please walk on by!

But I know what you mean Norcal, there's a lot of bad to learn from.
 
This was done by a large mechanical contractor. This company produces some outlandish results. I suspect that their advertising sells work faster than they can hire competent workmen.

View attachment 5778

The clearance is 31" top, 5" side, 5" rear and not enough between them.

View attachment 5779

View attachment 5780

I didn't open a disconnect but it's a good bet that there are fuses. That would qualify the disconnects for a working space violation. Yes that's right, no fuses, no breakers means no working space required. You must understand that when Lewis and Clark made the trip they brought along a can-do spirit that has lasted even to this day.
I'd be shocked if those units last more than 2-years with the lack of airflow.
 
I'd be shocked if those units last more than 2-years with the lack of airflow.

My worries too!

Just the cotton wood fibers here require the units to be rinsed about twice a year. Not sure what's floating around in the air in CA to clog the fins. There's a Phil Collins song in there somewhere!
 
I was there to inspect a new electric service. I had to find the water heater to verify a jumper between the hot and cold water pipes. The gas is included with that unless I find evidence of a gas fired furnace.

The slider is probably not legal in as much as it is in the back wall of a converted garage (Media room). Or depending on how you roll, big screen TV and couch storage room. The water heater and A/C lack permits.....so there's a furnace too.

48614385552_086ecb75f2_b.jpg

On top of everything else is a new bootleg roof.
 
Last edited:
48618578662_f9f1488755_b.jpg

48618434316_7b86db33de_b.jpg

The gap will allow the roof diaphragm to move independently of the wall diaphragm. That is not allowed during an earthquake. The structure can't have weak points that grant motion in the connections from one diaphragm to another and then to the foundation. That explains why anchor bolts are in a hole that's only 1/16" larger in diameter than the bolt.
 
Last edited:




The gap will allow the roof diaphragm to move independently of the wall diaphragm. That is not allowed during an earthquake. The structure can't have weak points that grant motion in the connections from one diaphragm to another and then to the foundation. That explains why anchor bolts are in a hole that's only 1/16" larger in diameter than the bolt.
Ya sure about that ICE?

May want to check out R602.10.8.2 #2 (below) and the associated Figure R602.10.8.2(1).

For Seismic Design Categories D0, D1 and D2, where the distance from the top of the braced wall panel to the top of the rafters or roof trusses is 151/4 inches (387 mm) or less, blocking between rafters or roof trusses shall be provided above the braced wall panel in accordance with Figure R602.10.8.2(1).

0


Note, in the figure it clearly details that 2-in max open space is permitted.
 
Ty,
The roof diaphragm edge nailing is achieved by the 2x blocking (shown). 8d @ 6"o.c. is required per Table 602.3(1).
That is not the edge of the diaphragm. This is a huge misconception that I have seen spread wide and far. The edge, is the actual edge of the sheathing - the rim board at the edge of the eave. If in a SDC 'C', the truss/rafter blocking is not even required.

Check out the following - https://www.sbcindustry.com/system/...am/node/pdf/1185/educationpptheelblocking.pdf
 
That is not the edge of the diaphragm. This is a huge misconception that I have seen spread wide and far. The edge, is the actual edge of the sheathing - the rim board at the edge of the eave. If in a SDC 'C', the truss/rafter blocking is not even required.

Check out the following - https://www.sbcindustry.com/system/...am/node/pdf/1185/educationpptheelblocking.pdf

The edge of the diaphragm is where the boundary nailing occurs. In our case that's over the eave blocks so that a transfer to the wall can be accomplished. The 602 diagram that you posted is in fact in our residential code.

The following detail is what we apply:

48626999577_dccaf811e7_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
The edge of the diaphragm is where the boundary nailing occurs. In our case that's over the eave blocks so that a transfer to the wall can be accomplished. The 602 diagram that you posted is inn fact in our residential code.

The following detail is what we apply:

View attachment 5788
Ok, so your jurisdiction has a local amendment that requires something other than the IRC.

That's great, but the IRC does not require what you were illustrating.
 
Ok, so your jurisdiction has a local amendment that requires something other than the IRC.

That's great, but the IRC does not require what you were illustrating.

I didn't realize that I was out there in left field. I do try to refrain from leading the masses astray. For all that see this please understand that what I post or do has little relevance beyond where I work.....and you don't. As Chevy Chase would say, "I'm tigerloose and you're not"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top