It's all good, that's what the extra stud is for.
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Boring. I see this at least once a week.
In case anybody thought otherwise, I was being facetious. Or sarcastic... You pick, I was joking.It's all good, that's what the extra stud is for.
Losing a stud is seldom a problem. There's plenty more where that one came from.In case anybody thought otherwise, I was being facetious. Or sarcastic... You pick, I was joking.
It’s better than before they were added.View attachment 15331
Joists were added for extra support for a spa on the deck. Architect signed off on it in a letter said it was adequate for the load (no seal).
Looks like the trusses did the first time at my Dollar General....View attachment 15331
Joists were added for extra support for a spa on the deck. Architect signed off on it in a letter said it was adequate for the load (no seal).
Was done by a Crack Head trying to scarf metal???
Your mom told you that thing about "if you can't say anything nice..." hunh....?The plumb cuts are nicely done
The rafters they were sistering to were original, but they had originally been supported or tied together at multiple locations along their span, which has all been removed, so all of the loading is now completely different.Are the double rafters sandwiching the original unchanged rafters? Was anything wrong with to the original framing? Was the new framing about more depth for insulation? I can't tell from photos if all the original framing that has been gone for 100 years or do is still there.