• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

An average day

Did they share a purpose for that nonsense with you? Seems like you'd wake up every morning with a homeless guy in the little foyer there. And he'll have his own bathroom too, looks like - that hollow door sure isn't gonna' keep anybody out..
 
What was built doesn't match what was drawn (more space to strike side of door to bathroom than shown, window in different location, etc.). Also, shouldn't the light switches and outlets in the alcove be weatherproof? No different than being under a patio cover, right?
 
conarb said:
What code sections are you going to cite? The only thing I see are weatherproof outlets.
Click to expand...

And a switch all mounted in a sheetrock covered wall. ...... nobody there asked for a code section.

I gave them options.....they chose the door option.
 
It takes a contractor to come up with something this lame.


25858434217_25439df16b_b.jpg

25858434437_c776d7339c_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
Tiger, you really don't like us do you?

I drive a Hummer as my every day car, when I built in Silicon Valley I had to do a 150 mile per day commute, mostly on I-680, Hummers have vertical windshields, CalTrans uses sweepers on 680 on almost a daily basis, the Hummer is now 14 years old and I've gone through 9 windshields, almost all from rocks thrown by those stupid sweepers, they run trucks ahead and behind the sweeping truck setting out and picking up cones as they go, this slows traffic to a crawl making it impossible for me to get over into the slow lane, I guess every time a rock hits and breaks my windshield I should take a picture, post it here, and say: "It takes a government employee to come up with something this lame."
 
conarb said:
Tiger, you really don't like us do you?
Click to expand...

Am I that obvious?
The contractor in the picture is an A license. Apparently they dribble crap on the roadway and hate paying for windshields. Hence a ridiculous sign. Would it occur to them to knock the loose stuff off the truck before it leaves a site? I bet that they did think of that and decided that it's just too much to ask for.

I have fielded complaints about busted windshields due to rocks on the road near work-sites. The people tell me that they have approached the contractor and been told to pound sand. That can result in an unexpected delay for inspection.
 
Last edited:
mark handler said:
Sign won't protect him in court
He also appears to be missing his mud flaps on the left....
Click to expand...

I just had two windshields replaced last month, the Hummer cost $330, the Viper $586, they came out to my house and did both in about 3 hours. If that truck caused the problem they would have udcoubtedly refused to pay on the basis that I was on notice to stay 200 feet away and tell me that I would have to prove that I was 200 feet behind the truck, as well as prove that a rock from that truck caused the damage. To sue for that amount I would have to go to Small Claims Court, if the owner of the truck was a corportation I would have to call the state and find out who the agent for service was (that is easily available), then I'd have to serve the agent, most agents make themselves 'unavailable', once served I would have to argue the case in Small Clams Court, it's always just less expensive to call the windshield replacement company and pay yourself.

A woman in a new car with paper plates rear-ended me at a stop light a year ago, she fumbled around in her purse and couldn't find anything, finally she found a checkbook and tore out a deposit slip and handed it to me, I saw she lived in a nice retirement community so told her we were blocking traffic and would call her later that day, when I got home I discovered there was no phone number on the slip so I wrote her a letter including copies of my insurance and license, she wrote "Return to Sender" across the face so I made a claim on my insurance, the bill was $1,700, $1,200 was covered by my collision insurance and $500 by my uninsured motorist insurance. I called and asked if they were going after her, I was told no they don't go after women since they are a protected class.
 
Unless it's part of an unsecured load (example: a 2x4 falling out of a stack in the bed of a pickup, or a ladder falling off a ladder rack), I doubt any court would rule the owner of the truck to be at fault. Your insurance is going to pay for the rock that cracks your windshield, not his.

Anecdote: In another life, I (briefly) drove an over-the-road truck for a living. I was on I-20 in Georgia in the wintertime and a sheet of ice half as big as the trailer I was pulling flew off the top and smacked a lady in an SUV square in the windshield. Hit her hard enough that it bent the A pillars. Thankfully she didn't crash and wasn't hurt, and just pulled over. I saw it fly off the truck in the mirror and pulled over as well. Called the police, did a report, the whole deal. Cop did not write me a ticket. Her insurance paid for her SUV and nothing went on my record.
 
JCraver said:
Unless it's part of an unsecured load (example: a 2x4 falling out of a stack in the bed of a pickup, or a ladder falling off a ladder rack), I doubt any court would rule the owner of the truck to be at fault. Your insurance is going to pay for the rock that cracks your windshield, not his.

Anecdote: In another life, I (briefly) drove an over-the-road truck for a living. I was on I-20 in Georgia in the wintertime and a sheet of ice half as big as the trailer I was pulling flew off the top and smacked a lady in an SUV square in the windshield. Hit her hard enough that it bent the A pillars. Thankfully she didn't crash and wasn't hurt, and just pulled over. I saw it fly off the truck in the mirror and pulled over as well. Called the police, did a report, the whole deal. Cop did not write me a ticket. Her insurance paid for her SUV and nothing went on my record.
Click to expand...

Local police here have been writing tickets for "unsecured load" for snow/ice buildup that flies off vehicles and strikes another. Now anytime I've heard of it, it has always been someone in an SUV/van where the owner was just too lazy to clean off the top of their vehicles. We have catwalks that commercial trucks can pull under to clean off the tops of the vehicles and trailers. Most are very good about doing it.
 
How does that work? It's not a "load" if I didn't put it on the truck. I'm (thankfully) not aware of any laws like that here in the States.

In my incident above, I was continuously driving: Left Augusta, GA in an ice storm, got almost to Alabama and it was bright and shiny = ice melted and flew off. I was supposed to know there was ice up there, and was also supposed to stop, climb 13'6" to the top of the trailer, and scrape it all off? That seems kind of, silly.
 
We have a Vehicle Code law that makes us tarp our loads, when trucks go through truck stops to get weighed the Highway Patrol checks the tarps, as far as rocks leaking out of tailgates I believe that's a civil matter.
 
JCraver said:
How does that work? It's not a "load" if I didn't put it on the truck. I'm (thankfully) not aware of any laws like that here in the States.

In my incident above, I was continuously driving: Left Augusta, GA in an ice storm, got almost to Alabama and it was bright and shiny = ice melted and flew off. I was supposed to know there was ice up there, and was also supposed to stop, climb 13'6" to the top of the trailer, and scrape it all off? That seems kind of, silly.
Click to expand...
I think that is likely the difference. In any situation I'm aware of, the driver looked at the 6-8 inches of snow and ice on top of their vehicle and made a conscious decision not to clean it off. The hunk of snow/ice flies off their vehicle at highway speeds and punches through the windshield of the person behind them, severely injuring the driver and any passenger in the front seat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top