That is sad.Ice..............not an inspector anymore? what?
That is sad.Ice..............not an inspector anymore? what?
For several reasons I have retired from LA County. I have a few projects to get done around the house and then I might go back to work somewhere else as a contract inspector.....or I might enjoy not putting up with the BS.Ice..............not an inspector anymore? what?
I don’t know.What caused that? Breaker too small?
What's wrong with 1&6?Fifty percent correct is not worth doing at all. 1,5,6 are so far off the mark as to be ridiculous.
I was asking about post #4907, not #4908 if you're responding to #4909.IRC Table 602.3(1) Rows 30, 31 and 32 are nails only for wood structural panels on a roof
TABLE R602.3(2)
ALTERNATE ATTACHMENTS TO TABLE R602.3(1) allows staples if the Ultimate Design Wind Speed is less than 130 MPH
Wood structural panels subfloor, roof footnote g
g. Specified alternate attachments for roof sheathing shall be permitted where the ultimate design wind speed is less than 130 mph. Fasteners attaching wood structural panel roof sheathing to gable end wall framing shall be installed using the spacing listed for panel edges.
I imagine ice is in an area with a UDWS is less than 130 mph so the staples should have been code compliant
What's wrong with 1&6?
I'm not sure in CA either but IPC 504.6 requires 6" max above the floor or indirect. It also requires the discharge pipe to be no less than two pipe diameters above the floor or indirect presumably for the air gap. I don't know the rationale behind the 6" requirement but it's been there for as long as I can remember.I'm not a California guy, but for #1 I would think the plumbing code also requires a certain minimum distance from the floor to provide an air gap.
The sheathing for the reroof is not structural. The sheathing is merely a substrate for attaching asphalt shingles. The plan check engineers apply a reduction in values when staples are used instead of nails for structural panels. As I recall the values are multiplied by 0.8.IRC Table 602.3(1) Rows 30, 31 and 32 are nails only for wood structural panels on a roof
TABLE R602.3(2)
ALTERNATE ATTACHMENTS TO TABLE R602.3(1) allows staples if the Ultimate Design Wind Speed is less than 130 MPH
Wood structural panels subfloor, roof footnote g
g. Specified alternate attachments for roof sheathing shall be permitted where the ultimate design wind speed is less than 130 mph. Fasteners attaching wood structural panel roof sheathing to gable end wall framing shall be installed using the spacing listed for panel edges.
I imagine ice is in an area with a UDWS is less than 130 mph so the staples should have been code compliant
California Plumbing Code:
608.5(3) states that the T&P shall terminate no less than 6” nor more than 24” above grade.
The inspector was stuck on the I-codes instead of California/UPC... on the right track in the wrong train, lol...Protection of plumbing pipe is required if the pipe is less than 1” away from the face of framing. Electrical is required to be protected if less than 1.25” away from the face of framing
Thats the old code that I remember enforcing from the IPC.California Plumbing Code:
608.5(3) states that the T&P shall terminate no less than 6” nor more than 24” above grade.
Water heater could be located above the first floor. An attic maybe. Easiest outlet could be through the soffit over the front door. T&P dumps at the same time as the Brownie troop rings the door bell to sell GS cookies.I don't know the rationale behind the 6" requirement but it's been there for as long as I can remember.