I will agree that they STARTED out like us - but they most definitely NOT like us. They typically want to be on the BOD so they can make a difference - but have you ever studied what is involved with being a BOD member? Look it up? They don't publish a manual, and their communications are locked down between themselves and ICC exec leadership. So the new BOD members get there with no concept of what they have just gotten themselves into. There is a big difference between getting elected and doing the work of the BOD-which is why I want MORE transparency from the BOD and the ICC exec leaders. Their meeting minutes are lacking on purpose - they have been chastised in the past for the lack of info in those minutes and they REFUSE to expand them. I have been close enough to see and hear them to know that they are walking down a path THEY chose and create - they get what they deserve based on those choices.Yankee said:I don't disagree that there are issues within and around ICC and a lot of that has to do with the "big business" atmosphere/goal, and much of that has to do with the former 10 years of false expectations with the economy. Ok, so, now we are all slapped down a bit now.
I followed the link to look at the BOD and I see a group of people who are riding the ICC mechanical bull, and from past experiences on other boards I can only say "walk a mile in their shoes" and then criticize.
My gut feeling is that 90% of the BOD are JUST LIKE US.