• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

An average day

Norcal said:
I forgot to ask, what is on the other side of that mess?
Click to expand...
A meter and disconnect. The drop has been disconnected at the utility pole. After the FU I didn't look any further. I did notice that there are no ground rods visible...of course the well casing might be the electrode but by the looks of it, there will be plenty of hoops after the pole is replaced.
 
Last edited:
ICE said:
The inspection request was for framing and rough electrical of an ADU The person that met me is a young man that says that he is studying to become a contractor. The plans call for shear walls wherever there is no opening. There are no shear walls and few anchor bolts. The only window into the bedroom is 14" wide. Drywall screws were used on the plywood. There is an electrical panel in a clothes closet. There is a new roof and no attic ventilation. No smoke or CO alarms wired. It was 108° and I wrote 18 corrections before I noticed the drywall screws.

The young man was polite and not even a hint of upset. I felt sorry for him. The guy in the next post is a jerk.
Click to expand...
I don’t know the full story, but he sounds like the kind of person you want to help.
 
ICE said:
A meter and disconnect. The drop has been disconnected at the utility pole.
Click to expand...
Where is that? Reason i ask … i have a colleague at work who lives in Lancaster, from her description the landscape sounds like your picture.
 
e hilton said:
I don’t know the full story, but he sounds like the kind of person you want to help.
Click to expand...
Oh he is but I was sent to that city for four days and might not be back. I said a prayer asking that he find qualified help.
 
3/8" rebar. The next time I spot a thrift store I am going to look for dolls and teddy bears.

IMG_3850.JPG
 
Do you Allow the drywall screws for the window flanges? Most every installation instructions I have read require a 3/8" head on the fastener. Roofing nail or pan head screw is all we allow.
 
The contractor put it off on the owner to provide a ladder to inspect the RTU. As luck would have it, the city does not allow inspectors to climb ladderrs to access a roof. I coud see four sides and there is no 120 volt receptacle visible so I wrote the correction. Tomorrow I will find out that the city does not require a receptacle.

IMG_3882.JPG
 
Last edited:
The job is a 200 amp service upgrade. The corrections are:
1. The water main at the front shall serve as an electrode.
2. Label the circuit breakers.
3. Install a bonding bushing where the armored GEC enters the cabinet.
4. Terminate the armor the protects the GEC at the fitting.
5. Install a bonding jumper at the water heater between the hot, cold and gas pipes.

The contractor asked me to release the service to Edison. He explained that the owner has children and needs electricity. He said that this it a typical outcome in this city. I told him that nobody ever goes without power and to figure it out. Before I drove away an EDISON crew showed up and commenced to energize the service. No release necessary....they didn't even talk to me. I have one more day to do in that city....and wouldn't you know, it's a Friday.


IMG_3887.JPG




IMG_3886.JPG
 
Last edited:
ICE said:
When the inspector states that gas pipe can’t be under a slab or inside a home he has made two incorrect statements. The lowest common denominator is what we deal with and those statements might be taken as absolute. He should have stopped with, “A gas meter shall not be located indoors.” and included, “Obtain a plumbing permit to relocate the gas meter to the exterior.”
Click to expand...
Speaks to my zealous belief that any request to correct a Code violation should be accompanied with a supporting Code/standard reference.
 
The inspection requested was for underground conduit. The contractor is a solar installer.

Looking left:
IMG_3906.JPG


At the corner:

IMG_3904.JPG


Looking right:

IMG_3905.JPG

A person who identified themselves as the "operations manager" called me. He says that nobody has ever made them expose the conduit. He asked if I knew the 15' rule which is that the conduit is only required to be visible every 15'. Unfotunatley I have not heard of that rule.
 
Last edited:
40' of 1" thinwall 52% filled. I included a "Be aware of a deration factor for more than three current carrying conductors in a raceway." However, since I will not do the followup inspection, that was wasted ink.

The dreation factor is the more important of the the two corrections. I'm pretty sure that few inspectors bother with that...especially on residential work. Knowing that makes me wonder if it is a worthy correction or just being picky.


IMG_3902.JPG
 
Last edited:
How was that fitting sealed where it entered the top of the box, and with that much pipe fill better hope they reamed the EMT well, going to make them redo it?
 
Norcal said:
How was that fitting sealed where it entered the top of the box, and with that much pipe fill better hope they reamed the EMT well, going to make them redo it?
Click to expand...
Here is a picture of the EMT entry. There is also a picture of the 3/0 service entrance conductors. There is plenty wrong with no AFCI on the 15&20 amp branch circuits as well as no GFCI on the swimming pool pump. I gave them a heads up about the more than three current carrying conductors in a raceway.


IMG_3898.JPG


IMG_3900.JPG
 
Last edited:
Even worse then where I live. Water heater was replaced in my mom's house, I was not involved but the excess gas flow valve was installed bass ackwards & inspector never caught it.
 
The inspection was for solar. The only information that I have is the address and the contractor's phone number....no permit....nothing but what the inspection request slip. So as soon as I see the service panel I assume that an upgrade was included in the scope of work. Luckily, the owner was present and he informed me that the service panel is several years old and it passed a final inspection.

IMG_3892.JPG
 
Based on the cleanliness of the water closet and surroundings, I wonder if the health department had been there in a while. :rolleyes:
 
Corrections that make no sense:

IMG_4199.JPG


This correction was written during a re-roof sheathing inspection. The existing transite vents were disallowed.

IMG_4205.JPG



This correction only applies to vertical walls.

As mtlogcabin pointed out in another thread, any framing that is less than 60° from horizontal is not a wall. Any wall less than 90° from horizontal is not vertical. My guess is that nearly all walls are not vertical.

IMG_4207.JPG


IMG_4213 2.JPG
 
Last edited:
Pictures sent to me by an inspector. The cabinet has been mounted over a hole in the wall with conductors leaving through the back wall. There has been a dismal effort to fix that.

Resized_20210205_124411.jpeg


Resized_Resized_20210203_124058.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top