Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
While I understand the need for accurate plans, I think all this inspector has taught the designer in this case is to put "or better" after each specification in the plans.The inspector is on an extended power trip. He wants to demonstrate that he knows how to read a set of PV plans. He is willing to waste everyone's time with a stupid request. Asking a contractor to remove #8 wire and replace it with #10 is proof enough that he is an menace. The final will be held up for weeks while the revised plans make it through the system and then he will be back at the site hoping for another violation.
That really sucks, I can't even imagine. I would not have returned either.A thread about roof sheathing reminded me of one of the darkest days of my life:
What seems like forever ago, I found myself on a construction crew building a farm store in rural Iowa. The frame was all steel. The roof was first layered with 4’x12’ Styrofoam panels. Then came ribbed steel sheets that were 2’ or 3’ wide…I can’t remember exactly but that does not matter for this story.
The crew was made up of farm kids. I was one of the few people there with any construction experience … I was therefor a leader at the ripe old age of 19. As myself and four other young men were laying down the roof, I would walk out on the Styrofoam panels in order to set the next row. I walked where I knew there was a framing support under the Styrofoam. I wasn’t hard to do as the supports followed a straight line.
I took a day off. One of the farm boys tried to be me and stepped at the wrong place and fell to the concrete slab below. He died that day. When I returned there was a rolling scaffold placed below the workers on the roof. The scaffold would limit a fall to about four feet.
I was blamed for the death of the young man because I had been walking the Styrofoam. I should point out that as I was doing so I saw others starting to step out and I stopped them with a stern warning to not do as I do. I didn’t go back to work there after that kid died.
Exactly. Even on an engineer-designed buildings, I'm not going to pull a hissyfit if the engineer said "two-ply 2x8" and the builder went with a three-ply 2x10.While I understand the need for accurate plans, I think all this inspector has taught the designer in this case is to put "or better" after each specification in the plans.
With inspection overreach like the previous one, I can see the counter overreach as a corrective measure....Either way it is the owner/customer that suffers...Many plans for PV projects are boilerplate. They call out 2”x4” at 24” o/c. because that’s the least possible acceptable construction. It is also common for the area to find 2”x4” at 16”o/c.
The state legislature has decided that plan checking PV plans is an unacceptable hurdle and now there is no plan check being done. The inspector is supposed to perform a plan check at the final inspection…as stupid as that sounds, it is a step in the right direction.
Service panel upgrade. Contractor argues that the grounding is existing and therefore legal. When told that the rod isn’t in contact with the Earth for eight feet he says they this is a ufer.
View attachment 10983
I don't see anything grounded there....Just for fun. Love the bare neutral. Building reported constructed 19 years ago.
View attachment 11027
What is the small set screw just above the hand?View attachment 10997
These steps were on the market during a time when the world was not so complicated. The liability insurance that a manufacturer would need today puts stuff like this out of reach.
Vertical conveyers. They are still around, but cannot be used for personnel.During construction they had a man-lift that was like a vertical conveyor belt, with a step and hand hold about every 8 ft. You walked up tomit, grabbed the handle as it passed by and stepped onto the step. One side was going up, other side was going down. Very efficient and much faster & easier than stairs. That practice stopped when the belt broke while fully loaded with workers.
Over the years I became friends with a few contractors. One stands out as interested in improving his game. Now that I am not working as much, I have been inspecting his work prior to the AHJ's stab at it. His desire to improve is not supported by the usual inspector that doesn't bother with a competent inspection.It can be difficult when you go have a look at your friends construction projects.
If I can remember, there is another story with this same contractor.
Agreed.....This wouldn't be a good idea anywhere on planet Earth.
I'll be honest and admit that I have no first hand experience with that racking manufacturer and they have a Certificate Of Compliance. And apparently approved in hurricane territory. (Miami-Dade NOA)Why is this a bad idea, providing the adhesive foam is compatible with the roofing material, stand off and has the sufficient uplift strength.
Lightning arresting system are use adhesive to attach the system to the roof, walk mats are done the same. Trim on cars used double side tape, we hang art on the wall with command strips.